ArticleRheumatology (Oxford, England)2026
Clinical outcomes in psoriatic arthritis patients with rheumatoid factor positivity.
Article in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comment on: Clinical outcomes in psoriatic arthritis patients with rheumatoid factor positivity: Reply.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe clinical and immunologic significance of rheumatoid factors (RF) in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) remains unclear. We aimed to determine the frequency and impact of RF positivity on clinical outcomes and biologic (b) disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) discontinuation in PsA.
methodsPatients enrolled after 1996 from a large PsA cohort were included for this study. RF was tested annually and was defined as ever positive or newly positive (excluding those positive at enrolment). Associations of RF with clinical outcomes, including achievement of minimal disease activity (MDA), components of MDA and bDMARD discontinuation, were assessed using univariable (UV) and multivariable (MV) generalized estimating equations.
resultsAmong 1074 patients, RF positivity was observed in 173 (16.1%) overall, including 55 (5.1%) who were positive at baseline. RF positivity was significantly associated with reduced odds for achievement of MDA (MV, OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.37-0.77), driven by worse patient pain, patient global and physical function, particularly in the bDMARD subgroup. These associations persisted in the bDMARDs subgroup when analyses were restricted to new RF positivity. Additionally, ever and new RF positivity was associated with increased odds for bDMARD discontinuation (MV, OR 2.65, 95% CI 1.34-5.24 and 2.78, 95% CI 1.57-4.92, respectively) independent of joint and skin disease activity.
conclusionRF was observed in 16.1% of the cohort, with 5.1% being positive at baseline. RF positivity was associated with lower odds for achievement of MDA and with bDMARD discontinuation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.