Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42033640›Full record

ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2026

Radiomics and artificial intelligence in pancreatic cyst characterization: future or fiction?

Cesare Maino, Paolo Niccolò Franco, Federica Omboni, Giuseppe Di Giovanni, Riccardo Inchingolo, Giulia A Zamboni, Davide Ippolito

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cesare MainoDepartement of Diagnostic Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Monza, Italy. mainocesare@gmail.com.
Paolo Niccolò FrancoDepartement of Diagnostic Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Monza, Italy. francopaoloniccolo@gmail.com.
Federica OmboniDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health - Institute of Radiology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Giuseppe Di GiovanniInterventional Radiology Unit, Ospedale Generale Regionale Francesco Miulli, Acquaviva delle Fonti, Italy.
Riccardo InchingoloInterventional Radiology Unit, Ospedale Generale Regionale Francesco Miulli, Acquaviva delle Fonti, Italy.
Giulia A ZamboniDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health - Institute of Radiology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Davide IppolitoDepartement of Diagnostic Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Monza, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) are increasingly detected due to the widespread use of cross-sectional imaging and represent a significant diagnostic challenge because of their heterogeneous biological behavior, ranging from benign lesions to neoplasms with malignant potential. Accurate characterization and risk stratification are essential to guide appropriate management and avoid unnecessary surgical interventions. Conventional imaging modalities, including computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), remain central to the diagnostic work-up; however, their ability to reliably differentiate cyst subtypes and predict malignant transformation remains limited. In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) and radiomics have emerged as promising approaches for improving the non-invasive characterization of PCLs by extracting quantitative imaging features beyond those appreciable through visual assessment. This narrative review summarizes the current evidence regarding CT- and MR-based radiomics and AI in pancreatic cyst characterization, focusing on their role in differentiating mucinous from non-mucinous cysts, identifying high-risk intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs), and supporting clinical decision-making. The potential advantages of these techniques are discussed alongside main methodological limitations, including variability in imaging acquisition protocols, segmentation reproducibility, small and often retrospective datasets, limited external validation, and interpretability of AI-based models. Further multicenter studies, standardized radiomic pipelines, and prospective validation are required before these tools can be reliably integrated into routine clinical practice.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceMachine learningMagnetic resonance imagingPancreatic cystsTomographyX-ray computed

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.