ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2026
Radiomics and artificial intelligence in pancreatic cyst characterization: future or fiction?
Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) are increasingly detected due to the widespread use of cross-sectional imaging and represent a significant diagnostic challenge because of their heterogeneous biological behavior, ranging from benign lesions to neoplasms with malignant potential. Accurate characterization and risk stratification are essential to guide appropriate management and avoid unnecessary surgical interventions. Conventional imaging modalities, including computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), remain central to the diagnostic work-up; however, their ability to reliably differentiate cyst subtypes and predict malignant transformation remains limited. In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) and radiomics have emerged as promising approaches for improving the non-invasive characterization of PCLs by extracting quantitative imaging features beyond those appreciable through visual assessment. This narrative review summarizes the current evidence regarding CT- and MR-based radiomics and AI in pancreatic cyst characterization, focusing on their role in differentiating mucinous from non-mucinous cysts, identifying high-risk intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs), and supporting clinical decision-making. The potential advantages of these techniques are discussed alongside main methodological limitations, including variability in imaging acquisition protocols, segmentation reproducibility, small and often retrospective datasets, limited external validation, and interpretability of AI-based models. Further multicenter studies, standardized radiomic pipelines, and prospective validation are required before these tools can be reliably integrated into routine clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42033640What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.