Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42033639›Full record

ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2026

The emerging role of 4D flow MRI in abdominal interventional radiology.

Ryota Hyodo, Ryota Horiguchi, Mami Iima, Shinji Naganawa

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ryota HyodoDepartment of Radiology, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan. hyodo.ryota.w3@f.mail.nagoya-u.ac.jp.
Ryota HoriguchiDepartment of Radiology, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.
Mami IimaDepartment of Radiology, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.
Shinji NaganawaDepartment of Radiology, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.

Funding

JSPS KAKENHI JP23K14917
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Four-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging (4D Flow MRI) enables time-resolved three-dimensional visualization and retrospective quantification of vascular hemodynamics within a single volumetric acquisition. Beyond morphology-based imaging, it provides comprehensive assessment of multidirectional flow patterns, collateral redistribution, and treatment-related hemodynamic changes across vascular territories. In abdominal interventional radiology (IR), 4D Flow MRI may offer incremental value in clinical scenarios where morphology alone is insufficient to characterize physiologically relevant hemodynamics. This review summarizes its applications in aortic interventions, portal venous interventions, and hepatic venous outflow disorders. In these settings, 4D Flow MRI may support functional assessment of endoleaks, evaluation of portal flow redistribution, and characterization of venous outflow obstruction and treatment response. Among current applications, endoleak characterization and early assessment of portal hemodynamic change after portal vein embolization, which may reflect subsequent liver hypertrophy, represent particularly promising use cases. However, current evidence remains limited and largely observational. Important technical considerations, including velocity encoding strategy, physiologic variability, metal-related artifacts, and workflow integration, must be addressed. In practical terms, 4D Flow MRI is best regarded as a complementary or problem-solving technique rather than a modality for routine clinical decision-making. Further multicenter validation and outcome-driven studies are required to define its clinical impact in IR practice.

Indexed as

4D Flow MRIEndovascular aortic repairHemodynamicsInterventional radiologyPortal vein embolization

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.