ArticleEuropean archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry2026
Parental expectations regarding the announcement of a diagnosis of a rare oral disease: a qualitative study in Marseille, France.
Article in European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo explore parents' expectations regarding the disclosure of an oligodontia diagnosis in dental practice and analysing them through the lens of core bioethical principles (principlism).
methodsA qualitative interview study was conducted with parents of children diagnosed with oligodontia, all of whom had attended at least one consultation at a French specialist centre. Interviews were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
resultsThe study sample consisted of 18 parents who reported frequent dissatisfaction with the way the diagnosis was disclosed. The findings suggest that a two-step disclosure process (initial diagnosis and specialist follow-up) is commonly used. Parents valued this approach, as well as referral to patient associations. They recommended this two-step process to allow time for initial emotional adjustment and subsequent discussion. Their expectations focused on clarity of information, the provision of written materials, emotional support, and sufficient consultation time. They emphasised the need for a caring attitude, confidentiality, and tailored communication that includes both the child and the parents. A tension may arise between parental desires to protect their child and the child's right to participate.
conclusionEffective disclosure of oligodontia requires more than clinical expertise; it demands a caring, ethically informed approach that balances clarity and empathy, as well as adequate time and resources, acknowledges uncertainty, and navigates the complex role of the child as a participant in their own care. The challenge, therefore, is to find the right balance between the duty of beneficence, the principle of non-maleficence, and the recognition of individual autonomy. Communication skills are essential for aligning clinical practice with parental expectations. These findings, although rooted in the context of a rare dental disease, have broader implications for improving communication in dentistry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42033627What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.