ArticleAIDS and behavior2026
Assessing an Implementation Science Strategy to Improve PrEP Primary Care Serving Black and Latino Communities.
Article in AIDS and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We examined the impact of a PrEP navigation implementation strategy on care engagement at nine New York City Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) in an Ending the HIV Epidemic (EHE) jurisdiction. Between March 2021 and April 2022, FQHCs implemented the strategy, which consisted of five distinct navigation activities conducted by the Navigator (e.g., PrEP refill). We extracted electronic medical record (EMR) data on navigation services attempted/delivered, HIV prevention service delivery (e.g., HIV testing), and demographic characteristics for 303 patients prescribed PrEP and identified as eligible for navigation (27.4% Black, 48.8% Latino). We analyzed differences in HIV prevention service delivery by navigation success. Out of 303 patients, 95 (31.4%) were reached for navigation and 208 (68.6%) were not. Patients who were successfully navigated had significantly greater care engagement during the study period. In addition, patients who were successfully navigated were more likely to have had timely care engagement. There were no differences in navigation success by characteristics examined (e.g., sex in EMR, race/ethnicity, insurance coverage). The navigation service most utilized was medical appointment assistance (77.9%). Navigation appeared effective in enhancing PrEP care engagement. Although additional strategies may be needed to reach patients not successfully navigated through this implementation strategy, our work may inform researchers, policymakers, and practitioners focused on enhancing PrEP care about evaluating implementation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42033626What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.