Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42033617›Full record

ReviewEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026

AI-driven tissue discrimination sensing methods for robot-assisted spine surgery: a state-of-the-art review.

Yaowen Nuo, Xiuyuan Chen, Hongxing Shen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yaowen NuoMedical School, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China.
Xiuyuan ChenDepartment of Spine Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China. chenxiuyuan@renji.com.
Hongxing ShenDepartment of Spine Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China. shenhongxing@renji.com.

Funding

Talent Cultivation Project of Renji Hospital (Grant No.RJTJ25-QN-031)the National Natural Science Foundation of China Grant No.82272476
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Spinal surgical robots have achieved widespread clinical adoption over two decades, yet their safe and precise bone resection remains fundamentally limited by the lack of reliable real-time tissue discrimination capabilities. Conventional single-modality sensing approaches (imaging, force, acoustic, bioelectrical impedance) each suffer from inherent drawbacks that compromise surgical safety. This state-of-the-art review systematically evaluates AI-driven tissue discrimination sensing methods specifically developed for robot-assisted spine surgery.Methods A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, IEEE Xplore, and CNKI (1990–2025) following PRISMA guidelines. Sixty eligible studies were included and categorized by sensing modality. We performed a comparative analysis focusing on the interplay between surgical procedures, sensor technologies, and AI algorithm architectures, with particular emphasis on the clinical value of AI-enabled multimodal fusion.Results Three key insights emerged. First, surgical operations exhibit distinct AI-sensing pairing preferences: drilling uses force/acoustic signals with SVM/BP networks for real-time breakthrough detection; milling relies on force signals with LSTMs for continuous time-series processing; cutting employs imaging with CNNs for anatomical segmentation. Second, sensor type fundamentally dictates AI design—imaging sensors pair with CNNs for spatial features, while force/acoustic sensors use recurrent networks for temporal patterns. Third, AI-driven multimodal fusion’s core value is resolving single-modality blind spots, not incremental accuracy gains. Fusion of force and acoustic signals elevated transitional zone recognition from 62% to 92%, significantly improving clinical robustness.Conclusion Single-modality sensing has fundamental limitations, making AI-enabled multimodal fusion an inevitable development trend. We propose a decision tree framework for selecting optimal AI-sensing combinations based on surgical requirements. Future directions include integrated AI-sensor platforms, pathology-adaptive learning models, and standardized evaluation protocols to advance autonomous spinal surgery.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceMultimodal fusionRoboticsSpinal surgeryTissue discrimination sensing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.