ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2026
Multimodal HSI-MRI system for tumor delineation in neurosurgical guidance.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study proposes the fusion of hyperspectral imaging (HSI) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for tumor delineation in image-guided neurosurgery, comparing three clinically inspired registration strategies and presenting a novel visualization for tumor resection guidance from both imaging modalities under controlled phantom conditions.
methodsA multimodal brain phantom dataset acquired with a 9.4T preclinical MRI scanner and an HSI camera was used. MRI tissues were segmented using a Segment Anything Model, while HSI data were classified with supervised XGBoost, SVM, and RF models. Three registration strategies were evaluated: surface-based registration, rigid landmark-based registration, and ArUco marker-based registration. Accuracy was assessed using fiducial registration error (FRE) and target registration error (TRE), and the overlap between modalities was quantified by the Dice similarity coefficient (DICE) and average surface distance (ASD).
resultsRigid landmark-based registration achieved the best performance (FRE of 1.7 mm, DICE of 85.4%), closely followed by the ArUco-based method, which required minimal infrastructure. Surface-based registration showed higher variability due to manual point acquisition. Overall, a high overlap between MRI and HSI tumor segmentations was observed and further enriching the information by integrating both approaches
conclusionsThe proposed framework enables a reproducible evaluation of HSI-MRI fusion strategies and highlights the complementary value of volumetric MRI and surface-based HSI. Future work will focus on multimodal tissue classification, improved phantom designs, and validation with patient data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42033581What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.