Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42033566›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI research2026

[

Eleonora G M Vosbeek, Louise V Straatman, Bart de Keizer, Hans G X M Thomeer, Adriana L Smit, Arthur J A T Braat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eleonora G M VosbeekDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Louise V StraatmanDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Bart de KeizerDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Hans G X M ThomeerDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Adriana L SmitDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands. a.l.smit-9@umcutrecht.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9126-9969
Arthur J A T BraatDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNecrotizing otitis externa (NOE) is a rare but severe infection of the external ear canal that can progress to osteomyelitis of the temporal bone, often caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Effective management requires prolonged systemic antibiotic therapy, as premature termination increases the risk of relapse. There is ongoing debate regarding the optimal duration of antibiotic treatment and the criteria for discontinuation. Functional imaging techniques, such as [67Ga]Gallium citrate SPECT/CT and [18F]FDG-PET/CT, have shown promise in assessing disease activity, but their roles in therapy evaluation remain underexplored. In this study, we describe the radiological disease activity during treatment and we relate activity at cessation of treatment to disease control in patients scanned with [67 Ga]Ga-citrate SPECT/CT and/or [18F]FDG-PET/CT. Secondly, inter-rater variability is assessed.

resultsTwenty patients with NOE, with a median duration of intravenous treatment of six months (range 1–24 months) were included. Relapse occurred in 3 patients. Qualitative assessment of 95 scans showed slight inter-rater agreement for [67Ga]Ga-citrate SPECT/CT (kappa = 0.167) and fair agreement for [18F]FDG-PET/CT (kappa = 0.400). Relapse was seen in patients both with and without complete resolution on imaging. In the semi-quantitative assessment, [67Ga]Ga-citrate SPECT/CT showed a decrease in countsmax ratio (1.93 to 1.35), but an increase in countsmean ratio (1.56 to 1.73) between baseline and end of treatment. [18F]FDG-PET/CT showed a 50% reduction in both maximal standardized uptake value, corrected for lean body mass (SULmax) and peak standardized uptake value, corrected for lean body mass (SULpeak) ratios and also a decrease in metabolic tumor volume (MTV) in most cases.

conclusionsSemi-quantitative measurements on [67Ga]Ga-citrate SPECT/CTs and [18F]FDG-PET/CTs demonstrated notable variation in NOE. However, our findings suggest that MTV might be a useful parameter in quantifying the [18F]FDG-PET/CT result during the course of disease. Although [18F]FDG-PET/CT with visual evaluation, potentially alongside MTV, appears to be the most effective, the inter-observer variability emphasizes the necessity for standardized protocols to improve consistency and reliability in clinical practice and to guide clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

External otitisFDGGallium-67Neuro-otologyNuclear imagingOtologyPET/CTRemissionSkull baseSPECT/CT

Identifiers

PMID42033566
PMCPMC13260529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.