ReviewJapanese journal of radiology2026
Brain PET in the era of anti-amyloid-β antibody therapy for Alzheimer disease.
Review in Japanese journal of radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Here the current and emerging roles of brain positron emission tomography (PET) in Alzheimer's disease (AD) in the era of anti-amyloid-β antibody therapy, with a focus on clinical applications, methodological considerations, and future perspectives were reviewed. A narrative review of the literature on PET imaging in AD, including FDG-PET, amyloid PET, and tau PET, was conducted with particular emphasis on their clinical utility in diagnosis, and disease monitoring. Relevant guidelines, including appropriate use criteria and Japanese clinical guidelines, were also reviewed. FDG-PET provides valuable information for the differential diagnosis of neurodegenerative dementias based on characteristic hypometabolic patterns, although its role remains supportive due to the lack of direct assessment of molecular pathology. Amyloid PET enables noninvasive visualization of cerebral amyloid-β deposition and has become essential for confirming eligibility for anti-amyloid therapies. Standardized use criteria and interpretation guidelines are critical for appropriate clinical implementation. Quantitative approaches, such as standardized uptake value ratios (SUVRs) and the Centiloid scale, improve comparability across studies and institutions. Tau PET reflects neurofibrillary pathology and correlates with disease severity and progression, with increasing relevance for patient stratification. In addition, recent advances in high-resolution dedicated brain PET systems and artificial intelligence-based image analysis are expected to enhance diagnostic performance and workflow efficiency. In the era of disease-modifying therapy, brain PET imaging has become integral to the clinical management of AD. Amyloid PET is indispensable for treatment eligibility, while tau PET provides complementary information on disease stage and prognosis. Ongoing technological and methodological advancements will further expand the role of PET imaging in precision medicine for dementia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.