ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2026
Bringing the Teaching Close to Home: Implementation of a Near-Peer Model for Introductory Hematology-Oncology Fellowship Lecture Series.
Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
New hematology/oncology fellows must rapidly master a wide breadth of clinical information to care for patients with varied diseases. Fellowship programs have wrestled with the most effective way to structure introductory didactics to optimally deliver relevant and appropriate information. We redesigned our 3-month introductory lecture series using a near-peer teaching model. Senior fellows were assigned to lecture on topics from our syllabus that align with their interests and paired with faculty who served as content experts. We hypothesized this approach would result in more fellows rating lectures as targeted to the right educational level; secondarily, this would foster senior fellows’ skills as educators. We present data from the first three years of curriculum implementation. Overall, the redesign was feasible with a several-month preparatory period. Most (71%) fellows felt the series provided information at the appropriate level; 100% of fellows and 83% of faculty felt this approach should continue. Areas for improvement include: planning for faculty-fellow collaboration for content development, coaching on educational design during the preparatory phase, and providing sufficient time for lecture development. The near-peer model has been continued in our program, with plans for iterative improvement.
Identifiers
42033561What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.