ArticleBrain imaging and behavior2026
Neuroanatomical signatures of chronotype in young adults.
Article in Brain imaging and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite extensive evidence linking chronotype to behavioral and physiological outcomes, its structural neuroanatomical correlates, especially in healthy young adults, remain insufficiently characterized, and multimodal structural investigations integrating Voxel-based morphometry (VBM), cortical thickness (CT), and brain-age metrics are still limited. We examined whether chronotype—preference for early or late sleep–wake timing—is associated with structural brain variation in 136 healthy young adults (68 early chronotypes [EC], 68 late chronotypes [LC]) using high-resolution MRI. Early and late chronotypes were defined using the Morningness–Eveningness subscale of the Chronotype Questionnaire (ChQ-ME): early chronotype (EC) scores 11–21 and late chronotype (LC) scores 22–32. The VBM analyses were conducted to assess gray and white matter morphology, complemented by CT analyses and estimation of brain-predicted age difference (Brain-PAD) as an index of biological brain aging. Sensitivity analyses additionally modeled ChQ-ME as a continuous predictor. Primary voxel-wise VBM analyses did not identify between-group differences in gray or white matter morphology that survived family-wise error (FWE) correction (p < 0.05). In pre-specified exploratory analyses (voxel-wise p < 0.001, uncorrected; cluster-level false discovery rate [FDR] correction q < 0.05), late chronotype (LC) participants showed an exploratory left cerebellar/occipital cluster with lower gray matter volume. Region-wise CT differences were nominal (p < 0.05) and did not survive FDR correction across regions. No significant differences in Brain-PAD were observed. In healthy young adults, chronotype-related structural differences were not detectable under conservative voxel-wise FWE correction; however, pre-specified exploratory analyses suggested a regionally specific cerebellar gray matter pattern and nominal CT trends. These findings motivate larger and longitudinal studies with objective sleep–wake timing measures to clarify whether sleep timing is linked to early structural variation and to test its potential modifiability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.