Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42033533›Full record

ReviewJournal of robotic surgery2026

Microvascular Anastomoses and Beyond: Exploring the Role of Robotic Systems in Microneurosurgery.

Giuseppe Esposito, Jennifer Ashley Watson, Martina Giordano, Clarissa A E Gelmi, Luca Regli, Pietro Giovanoli, Nicole Lindenblatt

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Giuseppe EspositoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Jennifer Ashley WatsonDepartment of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Martina GiordanoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Clarissa A E GelmiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Luca RegliDepartment of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Pietro GiovanoliDepartment of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Nicole LindenblattDepartment of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland. nicole.lindenblatt@usz.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robotic assistance has evolved from an experimental concept to an established platform across several surgical disciplines. In microsurgery, dedicated robotic systems have demonstrated feasibility, precision, and reproducibility in performing microvascular anastomoses, nerve coaptations, and lymphatic procedures in reconstructive surgery. In contrast, the adoption of robotics in cranial neurosurgery remains limited, with current clinical applications largely restricted to stereotactic, frame-based procedures such as Deep Brain Stimulation and Stereo-electroencephalography, rather than active microsurgical manipulation of brain, vessels and nerves intracranially. Microsurgical robotic platforms provide technical features including motion scaling, tremor filtration, wristed micro-instrumentation, and improved ergonomics, which closely align with the demands of neurosurgical tasks requiring sustained submillimetric precision on intracranial very small structures even in constrained or eloquent anatomical regions. In this mini-review, we integrate established evidence from robotic-assisted microsurgery to explore the translational potential of these systems in cranial microneurosurgery. Particular attention is given to intracranial microvascular anastomoses as a clinically appropriate entry point, due to the characteristics of the extracranial–intracranial bypass procedures. Also, the dissection of superficial tumors and their arachnoidal planes is considered a potential application, where precision and surgeon endurance outweigh operative speed. Existing evidence remains largely preclinical or exploratory, and robust clinical data are scarce. Further development of neurosurgery-specific instrumentation, optimized workflow integration, and dedicated preclinical and clinical studies are required to define the safety, indications, and potential benefits of robotics in microneurosurgery.

Indexed as

Anastomosis, SurgicalMicrosurgeryMicrovesselsNeurosurgical ProceduresRobotic Surgical ProceduresAnimalsHumansExtracranial-intracranial bypasses.MicroneurosurgeryMicrovascular anastomosesRobotic platforms

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.