ReviewJournal of robotic surgery2026
Microvascular Anastomoses and Beyond: Exploring the Role of Robotic Systems in Microneurosurgery.
Review in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robotic assistance has evolved from an experimental concept to an established platform across several surgical disciplines. In microsurgery, dedicated robotic systems have demonstrated feasibility, precision, and reproducibility in performing microvascular anastomoses, nerve coaptations, and lymphatic procedures in reconstructive surgery. In contrast, the adoption of robotics in cranial neurosurgery remains limited, with current clinical applications largely restricted to stereotactic, frame-based procedures such as Deep Brain Stimulation and Stereo-electroencephalography, rather than active microsurgical manipulation of brain, vessels and nerves intracranially. Microsurgical robotic platforms provide technical features including motion scaling, tremor filtration, wristed micro-instrumentation, and improved ergonomics, which closely align with the demands of neurosurgical tasks requiring sustained submillimetric precision on intracranial very small structures even in constrained or eloquent anatomical regions. In this mini-review, we integrate established evidence from robotic-assisted microsurgery to explore the translational potential of these systems in cranial microneurosurgery. Particular attention is given to intracranial microvascular anastomoses as a clinically appropriate entry point, due to the characteristics of the extracranial–intracranial bypass procedures. Also, the dissection of superficial tumors and their arachnoidal planes is considered a potential application, where precision and surgeon endurance outweigh operative speed. Existing evidence remains largely preclinical or exploratory, and robust clinical data are scarce. Further development of neurosurgery-specific instrumentation, optimized workflow integration, and dedicated preclinical and clinical studies are required to define the safety, indications, and potential benefits of robotics in microneurosurgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42033533What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.