Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42033520›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026

Global research trends and hotspots in single-port robotic surgery in urology: a bibliometric analysis.

Longtu Ma, Bo Hu, Hua Ma, Xiaoyu Huang, Bin Li

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Longtu Ma *Department of Urology, The Second Hospital & Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China.
Bo Hu *Department of Urology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Hua MaCollege of Medical Information and Artificial Intelligence, Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Xiaoyu HuangThe Affiliated Taian City Central Hospital of Qingdao University, Taian, China.
Bin LiDepartment of Urology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China. li851023@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-port robotic surgery in urology has attracted increasing interest as robotic platforms and reduced-access techniques continue to evolve. However, the literature in this field remains dispersed across different procedures, disease settings, and research groups, and its overall knowledge structure has not been systematically characterised. This study aimed to evaluate the global research landscape, hotspot evolution, and developmental trajectory of single-port robotic surgery in urology using bibliometric methods. Publications related to single-port robotic surgery in urology were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection on March 18, 2026. Only English-language articles and review articles published between 2008 and 2025 were included. Bibliometric and visual analyses were performed using CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and SCImago Graphica to assess publication trends, leading countries, institutions, authors, journals, cited references, and keyword-based thematic evolution. A total of 259 publications were included. Annual research output showed an overall upward trend, with a more marked increase in recent years. The United States dominated the field in publication output, citation influence, and institutional and author-level centrality, while several other countries and centres made important but comparatively smaller contributions. The Cleveland Clinic Foundation was the most productive institution, and a relatively limited number of closely connected research teams accounted for a substantial proportion of the literature. The source and citation structures were centred mainly on core urology journals, indicating that the field remains strongly embedded in specialty-based clinical discourse. Keyword analyses showed a clear thematic shift from early single-incision, single-site, and laparoendoscopic single-site surgery-related exploration toward dedicated robotic platforms, prostate-related applications, and perioperative outcome-focused evaluation. Research on single-port robotic surgery in urology has expanded substantially and shows a clear evolution from early reduced-port technical exploration to more mature platform-based and procedure-specific investigation. Despite this progress, the current evidence base remains relatively concentrated in a limited number of countries, institutions, and research teams. This bibliometric study outlines the global knowledge structure and hotspot evolution of the field and highlights the need for broader collaboration, more standardised reporting, and higher-quality clinical evidence.

Indexed as

BibliometricsRobotic Surgical ProceduresUrologic Surgical ProceduresUrologyHumansBibliometric analysisHotspotsResearch trendsSingle-port robotic surgeryUrology

Identifiers

PMID42033520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.