ArticleJournal of neurology2026
Patient-reported outcomes and experiences with COMT inhibitors in the management of motor fluctuations in Parkinson's disease: a UK-based nested cross-sectional study.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMotor fluctuations are a common complication in Parkinson's disease (PD), often managed with catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitors. We aimed to explore patient perspectives on their COMT inhibitor treatment and to evaluate and compare patient-reported outcomes and experiences with the COMT inhibitors opicapone and entacapone.
methodsThis UK-based cross-sectional study utilised anonymised, real-world data from the AccessPD registry. A convenience sample of 102 registry participants who had received either opicapone or entacapone. completed validated patient-reported outcome measures (PDQ-39 and, EQ-5D-5L) and an online survey assessing treatment experiences, preferences, and communication with healthcare providers.
resultsSurvey responses highlighted that increased ON time and reduced OFF time were the most valued treatment attributes for COMT inhibitors, while hallucinations and dyskinesia were the least acceptable side effects. Only 25% of respondents recalled being informed about alternative treatment options prior to starting COMT inhibitor therapy. Communication from clinicians about the role of these drugs was inconsistent, with 27.5% of participants only rating it as 'fair/poor' and 58% reporting no follow-up after initiation. Patients' overall quality of life was generally reported as mild to moderately affected in both treatment groups.
conclusionsSurvey findings underscore the heterogeneity of patient preferences and the need for improved clinician-patient communication and personalised care. Both COMT inhibitors should be considered in shared decision-making to optimise motor fluctuation management and quality of life in PD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.