Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42033482›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2026

Predicting bleb revision after XEN gel stent surgery in a real-world open-angle glaucoma cohort.

Caroline J Wenzel, Christina Pagonidou, Daniel A Wenzel, Vasyl Druchkiv, Emil Nasyrov, Bogomil Voykov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Preserflo microshunt outcomes in pigmentary glaucoma: a propensity score-matched comparison with primary open-angle glaucoma.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Caroline J WenzelDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany. caroline.wenzel@med.uni-tuebingen.de.
Christina PagonidouDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Daniel A WenzelDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Vasyl DruchkivDepartment of Research and Development, Clinica Baviera-AIER Eye Group, Valencia, Spain.
Emil NasyrovDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Bogomil VoykovDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Bleb fibrosisBleb revisionGlaucoma surgeryLess invasive bleb surgeryMinimally invasive bleb surgeryNeedlingXEN gel stent

Identifiers

PMID42033482
PMCPMC13578004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.