ReviewJournal of neurology2026
Burden of Disease in Myasthenia Gravis: A Targeted Literature Review.
Review in Journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMyasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare autoimmune neurologic disorder with a heterogenous disease presentation. The objective of this targeted literature review was to characterize the burden of disease and unmet treatment needs in patients with MG.
methodsScientific articles published in English between May 4, 2013, and November 24, 2025, were identified in the PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases using a pre-defined Boolean search strategy. Titles and abstracts were screened for information on clinical presentation, pathology, and diagnostic considerations for MG; burden of disease, including epidemiologic, clinical, humanistic, and economic burden; and treatments, including treatment guidelines.
resultsThe analysis included 318 records. Population-based estimates of MG incidence published from 2007 onwards ranged from 0.3 to 6.1 per 100,000 person-years, and prevalence estimates ranged from 2.2 to 58.6 per 100,000 persons. The clinical and humanistic burden of MG remains high, with patients reporting inadequate symptom control, fatigue, poor quality of life, and dissatisfaction with their current treatment. Greater disease severity was associated with reduced quality of life and poorer mental health. Medical costs varied by region, and key drivers of direct medical costs include hospitalization and treatment of exacerbation or myasthenic crisis.
conclusionThe burden of MG remains high, despite the availability of novel treatments. Studies are needed to better characterize the current burden of MG in the context of newer treatment options and to explore how the disease burden may be reduced for patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.