ArticleWomen's health (London, England)
Learning from the experiences of midwifery students and recent graduates in humanitarian and conflict-affected settings: A prospective cohort study protocol.
Article in Women's health (London, England). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealth workforce shortages are a serious impediment to the delivery of effective and person-centered care, particularly in conflict settings. Midwives are a critical cadre who can help avert maternal and child death, but face persistent barriers to education, employment, regulation, and professional development-challenges that are especially pronounced in conflict-affected areas. Few studies have systematically explored midwives' experiences in these settings.
objectivesThe EQUAL midwifery cohort study was established to systematically examine midwives' educational and professional trajectories in Northeast Nigeria and in Central and Southeast Somalia, with the goal of identifying context-specific factors influencing retention, deployment and professional growth.
designMultiple cohorts of students and recent graduates will be enrolled, complete an intake survey, and be followed with additional surveys approximately 6 months after enrollment and then annually. Focus group discussions and in-depth interviews with a sub-set of participants will follow each round of surveys to expand on survey findings. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Qualitative data analysis will focus on the lived experiences of participants, and how these experiences shape their professional identities and career trajectories. Survey analysis will assess levels of attrition, including withdrawal from training and exit from the profession post-graduation. Cox regression models will estimate hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for these outcomes, and median survival time in the profession will be calculated to determine when attrition is most likely. Risk factors for attrition during both training and professional practice will be examined. ETHICS: Ethical approval was obtained from John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, the Somali Research and Development Institute, and Yobe State Health Ministry of Health Ethics Committee. DISCUSSION: This research will offer insights into a critical yet under-explored segment of the global health workforce: early career midwives in conflict-affected settings. It serves as a proof-of-concept for the feasibility of longitudinal health workforce research in conflict-affected areas of Nigeria and Somalia, offering unprecedented evidence on the lived experiences and expressed needs of midwives to inform the improvement of midwifery education, working conditions, and support networks in these settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.