Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42033153›Full record

ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2026

Intestinal Organoid-Based Mathematical Modeling Predicts Clinical Gastrointestinal Toxicity of Oral Oncology Drugs.

Carmen Pin, Deepa Maheshvare M, Louis Gall, Andrew Hall, Muireann Coen, Ambra Bianco, Shimeng Liu, Kenneth Pryde

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Carmen PinSystems Medicine, Clinical Pharmacology and Safety Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8734-6167
Deepa Maheshvare MSystems Medicine, Clinical Pharmacology and Safety Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Bengaluru, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8879-8357
Louis GallSystems Medicine, Clinical Pharmacology and Safety Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1805-2357
Andrew HallSafety Sciences. Clinical Pharmacology and Safety Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Muireann CoenSafety Sciences. Clinical Pharmacology and Safety Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3542-8325
Ambra BiancoSafety Sciences. Clinical Pharmacology and Safety Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Shimeng LiuSafety Sciences. Clinical Pharmacology and Safety Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.
Kenneth PrydeSafety Sciences. Clinical Pharmacology and Safety Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

AstraZeneca
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity is a common and potentially severe side effect of antiproliferative cancer therapies that often requires dose reduction or treatment interruption. Despite the clinical implications, there are currently no robust strategies for quantitative preclinical assessment of GI toxicity. We have developed a human small intestinal organoid (hSIO)-based mathematical modeling approach for the early prediction of GI toxicity of oral antiproliferative cancer treatments. Our approach integrates the exposure-toxicity relationship quantified in hSIOs into a human mathematical model of the epithelium that enables the simulation of the impact of crypt proliferation impairment on epithelial dynamics. We show that, for oral drugs, when the enterocyte free drug concentration is used as a surrogate for the crypt exposure, the extent of the epithelial injury correlates with reported clinical incidence and severity of diarrhea. In contrast, when relying on plasma exposure, the model failed to predict intestinal injury for two out of the six diarrheagenic drugs tested. Our modeling approach distinguished the toxicity profiles of CDK4/6 inhibitors, predicting minimal epithelial injury for ribociclib and substantial epithelial disruption for abemaciclib, consistent with its higher clinical incidence of diarrhea. Similarly, the toxicity quantified in hSIOs enabled accurate prediction of epithelial injury and diarrhea severity for four epithelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). This approach introduces new GI safety assessment and clinical dose selection paradigms to enable the simulation of patients' response based upon in vitro drug response modeling.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsIntestine, SmallModels, TheoreticalOrganoidsAdministration, OralDiarrheaHumansModels, BiologicalAntineoplastic Agentsdiarrheadrug safetyGI toxicityPBPKQST

Identifiers

PMID42033153
PMCPMC13274747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.