Trial reportClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2026
A Phase 1/2 Dose-Ranging Safety and Immunogenicity Study of mRNA-Based Candidate Pandemic Influenza Vaccines in Healthy Adults.
Trial report in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05972174 (Phase 1/2, Randomized, Observer-Blind, Parallel, Dose-Ranging Study to Evaluate the Safety, Reactogenicity, and Immunogenicity of mRNA-1018 Pandemic Influenza Candidate Vaccines in Healthy Adults ≥18 Years of Age), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Phase 1/2, Randomized, Observer-Blind, Parallel, Dose-Ranging Study to Evaluate the Safety, Reactogenicity, and Immunogenicity of mRNA-1018 Pandemic Influenza Candidate Vaccines in Healthy Adults ≥18 Years of Age
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInfluenza A viruses pose a persistent pandemic threat. We report safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity findings for mRNA-1018 pandemic influenza vaccine candidates from a phase 1/2 study in healthy adults.
methodsIn part A, participants were randomized to receive 1 of 4 mRNA-1018 candidates at 1 of 3 dose levels across 2 influenza A groups: (1) H5N8/H5-only or (2) H7N9/H7-only. Part B participants were randomized to receive H5-only-CG. The primary objectives were to evaluate the safety and reactogenicity. The secondary objectives included evaluation of humoral immunogenicity through day 205 by hemagglutination inhibition (HAI), neuraminidase inhibition, and microneutralization assays.
resultsParts A and B comprised 1195 and 304 dosed participants, respectively. Overall, solicited local adverse reactions (ARs) within 7 days of vaccination occurred in 76.8% of participants across vaccine candidates and dose levels, most commonly injection-site pain. Solicited systemic ARs were reported in 62.8% of participants, most frequently fatigue and headache. Postvaccination immune responses, assessed absolutely, by HAI titers and dynamically, by seroconversion rates, tended to increase with vaccine dose. H5-based candidates induced stronger strain-specific HAI.
conclusionsVaccine candidates were sufficiently well tolerated and immunogenic. Further development of mRNA pandemic influenza vaccines is warranted.Clinical Trials Registration. NCT05972174.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.