Trial reportEuropean stroke journal2026
Validation of the SMART-REACH model after stroke and the effect of colchicine by atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk category: a secondary analysis of the CONVINCE randomised clinical trial.
Trial report in European stroke journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02898610 (CONVINCE -), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
CONVINCE - (COlchicine for preventioN of Vascular Inflammation in Non- CardioEmbolic Stroke) - a Randomised Clinical Trial of Low-dose Colchicine for Secondary Prevention After Stroke
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe Colchicine for prevention of vascular inflammation in Non-CardioEmbolic stroke (CONVINCE) trial showed that recurrent events were significantly reduced among colchicine-adherent non-cardioembolic stroke patients in the on-treatment analysis. This study aimed to validate the SMART-REACH risk score in stroke patients, and to determine whether colchicine's efficacy varies by baseline atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk. PATIENTS AND
methodsPatients with non-severe non-cardioembolic ischaemic stroke/transient ischaemic attack (TIA) were randomised to colchicine 0.5 mg plus usual care or usual care alone. Participants were stratified into moderate (10%-19%), high (20%-30%) and very high (≥30%) 10-year ASCVD risk categories using the SMART-REACH model. Model performance was assessed using the C-statistic and calibration plots. The primary endpoint (major adverse cardiovascular events [MACE]) was a composite of fatal or non-fatal recurrent ischaemic stroke, myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest or hospitalisation for unstable angina.
resultsAmong 3144 patients, MACE incidence significantly increased with ASCVD risk levels: 7.2% (moderate), 8.8% (high) and 13.8% (very high) (P < .01). The C-statistic for 3-year risk of MACE was 0.59 (95% CI, 0.56-0.63). While no statistically significant treatment interaction was found (P = .88), absolute risk reductions (ARRs) were more pronounced in higher-risk groups: moderate risk 7.2% (colchicine) vs 7.2% (usual care) (hazard ratio [HR] 1.01; 95% CI, 0.55-1.83); high risk 7.7% vs 9.8% (ARR 2.1%; HR 0.79; 95% CI, 0.53-1.18); very high risk 12.5% vs 15.2% (ARR 2.7%; HR 0.85; 95% CI, 0.64-1.12). DISCUSSION AND
conclusionWe identified an association between very high baseline ASCVD risk (≥30%) assigned by the SMART-REACH score and increased recurrent MACE. Although no significant treatment interaction was observed, patients in higher risk categories may represent a more promising target population for secondary prevention with colchicine.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02898610.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.