ArticleANZ journal of surgery2026
Wide-Awake Local Anaesthesia No Tourniquet Hand Surgery in Australia: An Analysis of Adoption, Perceptions and Implementation in a Global Context.
Article in ANZ journal of surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWide-awake local anaesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) is increasingly used globally for hand surgery, offering clinical and operational benefits. However, its adoption in Australia remains understudied. This study assessed current WALANT usage among Australian hand surgeons to identify key factors influencing its implementation.
methodsA national cross-sectional survey of all Australian Hand Surgery Society (AHSS) active members (n = 164) was conducted in 2024. The survey examined current WALANT use, perceived benefits and drawbacks, as well as facilitators and barriers of incorporation into practice. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics and qualitative data were analysed thematically.
resultsSixty-eight surgeons responded (41% response rate). Seventy percent had performed WALANT at least once, and 50% incorporated it in practice. Current WALANT use was associated with hand surgery fellowship (OR = 8.7), prior WALANT exposure during training (OR = 6.1) and practice in university/teaching hospital (OR = 3.2). Respondents highlighted avoidance of general anaesthesia, shorter recovery, improved patient satisfaction and lower costs as benefits. Conversely, workflow inefficiencies, limited outpatient infrastructure, concerns over anaesthetist scheduling and remuneration and the absence of dedicated billing codes were the dominant barriers. Non-users viewed WALANT as more complex and remained wary of adrenaline safety, whereas users perceived more benefits and reported few technical concerns.
conclusionWALANT is used by a substantial proportion of Australian hand surgeons, but broader adoption is limited by systemic and institutional barriers contributing to a perception gap. Training, infrastructure, policy reform, appropriate funding mechanisms and interprofessional collaboration may support wider integration of WALANT in Australia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.