ArticleJournal of pregnancy2026
Left Behind After Birth: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Factors Associated With Postnatal Care Use in Sub-Saharan Africa.
Article in Journal of pregnancy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Left Behind After Birth: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Factors Associated With Postnatal Care Use in Sub-Saharan Africa.Journal of pregnancy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGlobal commitment towards improving maternal and newborn health outcomes is pronounced, yet this is yielding little results as gaps in postnatal care (PNC) coverage persist across sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Low uptake of PNC partly contributes to preventable maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality within the early days after birth. A better understanding of the individual, systemic and contextual factors influencing PNC uptake is vital for shaping effective policies and targeted interventions. This study explores the prevalence and factors associated with PNC utilisation among women and newborns across 27 SSA countries, aiming to identify key factors influencing service uptake to inform targeted interventions.
methodsWe used data from the Demographic and Health Surveys (2015-2024), including 136,721 women aged 15-49 who had a live birth within 2 years of the survey. Andersen's behavioural model guided the selection of predisposing, enabling and need factors. Multivariable logistic regression was employed to identify determinants of PNC utilisation for both mothers and newborns, adjusting for sampling design.
resultsThe overall prevalence of PNC utilisation was 75.24% for mothers and 79.37% for children. PNC coverage varied significantly across countries, with the highest maternal utilisation in Ghana (94.9%) and the lowest in Malawi (47.5%). For newborns, coverage ranged from 96.7% in South Africa to 43.1% in Ethiopia. Significant factors associated with PNC uptake included caesarean delivery (AOR = 3.64; 95% CI: 3.33-3.98), four or more antenatal visits (AOR = 1.24; 95% CI: 1.20-1.29), higher maternal education (AOR = 1.32; 95% CI: 1.17-1.49), health insurance, employment status and frequent media exposure. Conversely, women with unintended pregnancies and limited access to health information were less likely to utilise PNC services.
conclusionPNC utilisation in SSA remains suboptimal and uneven. Addressing barriers related to education, healthcare access, media exposure and financial protection is essential to improving postnatal outcomes. Targeted, context-specific strategies are needed to accelerate progress towards achieving Sustainable Development Goal 3 in the region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.