ArticleClinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.)2026
Competency-Based Medical Education and the Evolving Role of Anatomical Sciences in Undergraduate Medical Education.
Article in Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Competency-based medical education (CBME) has become a central organizing framework in undergraduate medical education (UME), emphasizing observable performance and developmental progression rather than time-based advancement. This transition carries important implications for foundational disciplines, particularly the anatomical sciences. Historically delivered as a concentrated preclinical experience, anatomy must now function within integrated curricula that prioritize clinical application, longitudinal assessment, and entrustment decisions. This commentary examines how CBME reframes anatomy from a front-loaded knowledge domain to a longitudinal clinical capability, where it constitutes a foundational discipline that shapes clinical competence, patient safety, and procedural reasoning across medical training. It discusses the need for explicit articulation of discipline-specific anatomical competencies aligned with patient care, reconsideration of assessment strategies that extend beyond written examinations, and support for faculty as their roles evolve toward coaching, observation, and performance interpretation. The paper further argues that effective implementation of CBME in anatomy requires deliberate alignment with established learning theories, including principles of deliberate practice, cognitive load management, experiential learning, and self-regulated learning. Without such theoretical grounding, competency frameworks risk functioning as administrative structures rather than mechanisms for expertise development. By integrating clearly defined competencies, theory-informed pedagogy, and programmatic assessment, anatomical sciences can maintain their central role in preparing clinically competent physicians within contemporary medical education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.