ArticleThe Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology2026
Episiotomy and Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury Among Unassisted Vaginal Births: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMediolateral episiotomy (MLE) is a common procedure. Whether it modifies the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) in nulliparous and parous people is unclear.
aimsWe performed a retrospective cohort study to assess if MLE was associated with decreased OASI. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective cohort study including all unassisted vaginal births from 36 weeks' from 2008 to 2021 was assembled. Analysis was separated for first and subsequent vaginal births, adjusting for maternal height, body mass index (BMI), ethnicity, prior caesarean birth (if no previous vaginal birth) or pre-delivery parity (if there was a previous vaginal birth), smoking status, augmentation of labour, induction of labour, length of second stage, caregiver type, socioeconomic deprivation quintile, gestational age, baby head circumference, baby birthweight and use of epidural using Generalized Linear Models.
resultsThere were 49 363 unassisted vaginal births. Of these, 20 201 were first vaginal births (19 082 nullipara and 1119 with one prior caesarean birth), 27 825 subsequent vaginal births, and 1337 unknown vaginal birth status. Episiotomy and OASI were recorded in 28.6% and 3.6% of first and 9.1% and 0.8% of subsequent vaginal births, respectively. Among first vaginal births, there was no association between episiotomy and OASI in univariable (RR 1.00 (0.86, 1.17)) or multivariable analysis (RR 0.91 (0.77, 1.09)). Among subsequent vaginal births, episiotomy was associated with increased odds of OASI in univariable (RR 2.21 (1.57, 3.13)) and multivariable analysis (RR 1.55 (1.08, 2.22)).
conclusionOur findings do not support the use of MLE for first births and suggest harm for subsequent births.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.