Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42032815›Full record

ArticleGenetics2026

Neural posterior estimation for population genetics.

Jiseon Min, Yuxin Ning, Nathaniel S Pope, Franz Baumdicker, Andrew D Kern

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Coalescence and translation: A language model for population genetics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jiseon MinInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, United States.
Yuxin NingInstitute for Bioinformatics and Medical Informatics (IBMI), University of Tübingen, Tübingen 72076, Germany.
Nathaniel S PopeInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8409-7812
Franz BaumdickerInstitute for Bioinformatics and Medical Informatics (IBMI), University of Tübingen, Tübingen 72076, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9106-7259
Andrew D KernInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4381-4680

Funding

Deep learning for population geneticsR01HG010774 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI ANDREW D KERN · 2020 to 2026
$3.2M
Scaling up computational genomics with tree sequencesR01HG012473 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI PETER Lochhead RALPH · 2023 to 2026
$2.3M
Computational Population GeneticsR35GM148253 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI ANDREW D KERN · 2023 to 2026
$1.5M
Deutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftDFGGerman Research FoundationNHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG010774NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG012473NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM148253NIH HHS R01HG010774NIH HHS R01HG012473NIH HHS R35GM148253
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Simulation-based inference methods are increasingly being used in population genetics due to their flexibility and ability to be applied in settings where likelihood-based methods are intractable. Perhaps the best known such method is Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC); however, its popularity is offset by its shortcomings which include computational expense and an unfortunate inability to efficiently fit models to high-dimensional summaries of the data. An alternative approach that solves these issues is supervised machine learning (ML); however, ML methods generally do not yield Bayesian uncertainty estimates of the quantities they predict. Here, we apply a recently introduced method, neural posterior estimation, that combines the best facets of ABC and supervised ML by training a neural network to estimate the posterior distribution of a population genetics model. We first compare neural posterior estimation with other inference methods for a variety of population genetic tasks, and show that neural posterior estimators yield posterior distributions with high accuracy and efficiency. We compare learned posterior distributions given raw genotypes and various summary statistics as input data. Additionally, we apply neural posterior estimation for demographic inference for simple and more complex models to highlight its application, including an analysis of demographic history in Drosophila melanogaster. Finally, we provide a user friendly workflow that enables others to perform neural posterior estimation on their own genetic data.

Indexed as

Genetics, PopulationModels, GeneticNeural Networks, ComputerAnimalsBayes TheoremComputer SimulationDrosophila melanogasterMachine LearningBayesian inferencedeep learningmachine learningpopulation geneticssimulation

Identifiers

PMID42032815
PMCPMC13334119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.