ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026
Supervised fine-tuning enhances unsupervised learning from 45 million amino acids in TCR and peptide sequences.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationT cell receptor (TCR) and peptide interactions (TPI) are one of the most important parts of T cell immunity. Experimental identification of TPI is time-consuming and labor-intensive; therefore, it is necessary to develop computational prediction method that exploit existing data to predict TPI.
resultsWe use huge TCR and peptide sequences to pre-train two language models (∼152M parameters), respectively, and integrate them into a sequence-based only prediction framework (i.e. RoBERTcr) with supervised fine-tuning (SFT). Visualization of amino acids embedding from pre-trained language model (PLM) shows biochemical clusters based on different properties, and our PLMs outperform existing protein language models (i.e. ESM and ProtTrans) under the same condition. RoBERTcr achieved higher performance than other state-of-the-art methods based on structures or sequences without dataset bias. The visualization of attention from our framework implies valuable spatial information that residues in TCR contacting peptides are the key to their interaction. AVAILABILITY: RoBERTcr is free available at https://fca_icdb.mpu.edu.mo/robertcr/ and https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18043054.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.