ArticleMovement ecology2026
The 'aukward' use of hidden Markov models in a pursuit-diving seabird: semi-supervised HMMs improve behavioural classification and energetic inference in auks.
Article in Movement ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Global seabird declines underline the need for accurate behavioural inference at sea to guide conservation. For pursuit-diving species such as auks, differentiating between resting and foraging is difficult due to similar above-water movement patterns, biasing estimates of behaviour-specific habitat use and energy expenditure. We deployed combined GPS-time depth recorders on 28 puffins during the 2021, 2023, and 2024 breeding seasons and compared inferred behaviours using outputs from GPS-only, dive-informed, semi and fully supervised hidden Markov models (HMMs) using state forcing rules. GPS-only and dive-informed models routinely conflated resting/drifting and foraging behaviours. The semi-supervised model best distinguished behavioural states, identifying 89% of track segments containing at least one dive as foraging, providing a more conservative approach compared to the supervised model when classifying transit, while avoiding inflating the number of foraging for segments with large step lengths. Compared to the GPS-only model, used here as baseline, the dive-informed model provided greater estimates of energetic expenditure by 12–21% relative to the models using forcing rules. Integrating dive data into a semi-supervised HMM refines behavioural classification, enabling more realistic energy budgets and precise mapping of important behaviour-specific habitats for conservation planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.