ReviewJournal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care2026
Integrated use of natriuretic peptides and DASI for cardiac reserve evaluation in high-risk surgical patients: a narrative review.
Review in Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe perioperative management of high-risk patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery remains a significant challenge in modern healthcare. Accurate preoperative risk stratification is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes and resource allocation. This narrative review explores the emerging approach of combining natriuretic peptide measurements with the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) to evaluate cardiac reserve in high-risk surgical patients. MAIN BODY: We examine the individual roles of natriuretic peptides (primarily B-type natriuretic peptide and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) and the DASI in preoperative risk assessment, highlighting their strengths and limitations. The rationale for integrating these two measures is discussed, emphasizing their complementary nature in providing both objective biomarker data and patient-reported functional status. The review synthesizes current evidence supporting this combined approach, including recent studies demonstrating improved risk discrimination compared to traditional methods. We outline a methodology for implementing this integrated assessment, addressing the timing of measurements, interpretation of results, and integration with existing risk stratification tools. Furthermore, we provide guidance on the management of identified high-risk patients, including prehabilitation and optimization strategies. The natriuretic peptide/DASI approach is also positioned within the broader context of perioperative assessment to guide appropriate clinical implementation.
conclusionThe integration of natriuretic peptides and DASI represents a promising strategy for enhancing preoperative cardiac risk assessment in high-risk surgical patients. While further research is needed to refine and validate this approach, it offers a practical and potentially powerful tool for improving perioperative care and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.