ArticleInjury epidemiology2026
Dog bite injuries and armed conflict-related environmental stressors: a nationwide population-based time-series study.
Article in Injury epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDog bite injuries pose a substantial public health burden worldwide. Environmental and acoustic stressors may contribute to dog behavioral dysregulation. However, there are as yet no population-level studies evaluating whether the incidence of dog bites increases during periods of armed conflict. The present study was conducted in Israel where the population is routinely exposed to an episodic pattern of high-intensity conflicts (escalation) alternating with periods of calm (de-escalation), providing a unique natural experiment to examine the effect of environmental stressors on population-level modifiers of injury risk.
methodsThis nationwide retrospective observational study covered the decade from 2014 to 2025. Healthcare-encounter data were used to capture dog bite-related diagnoses in both hospital and community settings. Exposure to armed conflict-related environmental stress was operationalized using the number of civil defense sirens per month, categorized as none (0), low (< 500), or high (≥ 500) and aggregated by geographic region (North, Center, South). Monthly dog bite counts were modeled using negative binomial regression adjusted for region, seasonality, age group, sex, and socioeconomic status. Secondary outcomes were hospitalization within 7 days and surgical intervention within 30 days, reflecting injury severity.
resultsA total of 63,285 dog bite-related encounters were identified. Compared to months with no sirens, adjusted dog bite incidence increased by 15% during low-exposure months (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.15, 95% CI 1.13-1.18) and by 33% during high-exposure months (IRR 1.33, 95% CI 1.28-1.37), demonstrating a graded exposure-response association. High exposure was associated with increased odds of surgical intervention within 30 days (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.02-1.16; P = 0.013).
conclusionsThis study provides the first population-level evidence linking armed conflict-related environmental stressors to increased dog bite incidence, using a quantitative graded exposure measure rather than a binary conflict-period definition. Dog bite prevention and healthcare preparedness should be taken into consideration in civilian injury mitigation strategies during armed conflict.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.