ArticleHuman genomics2026
Sex-aware genome-wide assessment of de novo variants in autism across coding and noncoding regions.
Article in Human genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAutism spectrum disorder (ASD) shows a consistent sex bias, yet how sex shapes de novo variant (DNV) risk across coding and noncoding sequence remains unclear. I analyzed DNVs in > 41,000 parent–child sequenced trios from three ASD family-based cohorts and compared DNV characteristics and enrichment patterns in males and females. Notably, these trios included individuals with ASD as well as those without ASD. I developed a new sex-aware DNV caller (HAT-FLEX) and thoroughly evaluated each candidate DNV using an additional tool introduced in this study, SNOW, to generate a high-confidence callset.
resultsI identified enrichment of missense and loss-of-function (LOF) DNVs both overall and within known ASD-related genes (i.e., SFARI genes). Gene-specific enrichment analyses revealed twelve genes that were exome-wide significant and specific to males, for significance, including FOXP1, SMAD6, AUTS2, CCDC168, PIEZO1, EML6, ZNF84, IGSF23, OTOG, NHSL1, ADNP, and FREM3 and three genes that were specific to females, for significance, including TAOK1, MECP2, and DDX3X within a variant class. Direct comparisons of DNVs in males and females revealed MECP2 as the only exome-wide significant gene; however, GABBR2 was also trending toward enrichment in the direct males with ASD comparison to females with ASD. Furthermore, probit analyses support a female protective effect and demonstrates that damaging DNVs, particularly LOF variants, including potentially stronger X-linked effects in females, are associated with increased ASD liability, whereas synonymous variants are not. Finally, I analyzed promoters and identified a single significant promoter region (p = 3.8 × 10−13), associated with the WDR74 gene, with the signal driven by DNVs observed in males with ASD. Surprisingly, the noncoding RNA gene RNU2-2 lies within this significant WDR74 promoter and accounted for most of the DNVs in the region. RNU2-2 DNVs were present in 0.2% of individuals with ASD in comparison to 0.05% of individuals without ASD.
conclusionsThese findings show that ASD DNV risk differs by sex at both the gene and liability levels, supporting a female protective effect while highlighting sex-specific patterns in coding variation. They also identify RNU2-2 as a noncoding contributor to ASD risk, expanding the landscape of ASD-associated variation beyond protein-coding genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.