ArticleMolecular neurodegeneration2026
Plasma proteomic signatures of preclinical Alzheimer's disease in clinically unimpaired older adults.
Article in Molecular neurodegeneration, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Plasma proteomics reveals divergent sex-specific senescence and bone biology signatures across neurodegenerative diseases.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMulti-analyte plasma proteomic panels that can accurately detect initial Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathology in preclinical populations and simultaneously measure related biological processes relevant for disease risk are critical for advancing early detection and prognosis.
methodsUsing the NULISAseq™ CNS panel, we measured plasma proteomics from 315 clinically unimpaired (CU) older adults across two independent cohorts: the Stanford Aging and Memory Study (SAMS; n = 193) with paired cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma analyzed with Lumipulse, and the Attention, Memory, and Aging Study at Stanford (AMASS; n = 122) with paired florbetaben (FBB) amyloid PET. We evaluated correspondence of core AD-relevant biomarkers pTau217, pTau181, Aβ42/Aβ40, pTau217/Aβ42, GFAP, and NfL measured using multiplex NULISAseq and single-plex Lumipulse immunoassays. ROC curve analyses compared performance for detecting amyloid-positivity (A+) (a) across platforms in SAMS and (b) across brain-derived (BD) and total-pTau assays in AMASS, leveraging novel NULISAseq immunoassays. Linear models were applied across all NULISAseq CNS proteins to explore proteomic abundance patterns associated with age, sex, APOE-ε4, amyloid burden (CSF Aβ42/Aβ40, amyloid PET), and tau burden (CSF pTau181, PI-2620 tau PET) using an FDR-corrected p-value of < 0.05 to identify significant targets.
resultsIn SAMS, moderate to high correlations were observed between NULISAseq and Lumipulse plasma biomarkers. NULISAseq pTau217/Aβ42 (AUC: 0.940) and pTau217 (AUC: 0.879) performed as well as corresponding single-plex Lumipulse assays (pTau217/Aβ42, AUC: 0.907; pTau217, AUC: 0.838) for detecting CSF A+ in SAMS. In AMASS, BD-pTau217 (AUC: 0.920) and BD-pTau181 (AUC: 0.920) exhibited the highest performance in discriminating PET A+, providing significant performance gains compared to total-pTau measures (pTau217, AUC: 0.861; pTau181, AUC: 0.763). Exploratory proteomic abundance analyses across NULISA CNS targets revealed pTau isoforms as most differentially expressed with amyloid burden across cohorts, together with upregulation of GFAP and downregulation of Aβ42 in SAMS. Tau burden was associated with upregulation of plasma pTau217, independent of amyloid burden, together with proteins related to astrocyte activation, inflammation, and synaptic integrity.
conclusionsNULISAseq multiplex immunoassays, including novel BD-pTau assays, accurately detect AD pathology among CU older adults and identify multiple biological pathways related to aging and early biomarker abnormality that may become dysregulated in preclinical AD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.