Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42032742›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2026

Evaluation of nursing performance during coronary artery bypass grafting surgeries using machine learning analysis of surgical videos: a multicenter retrospective study.

Qing Tang, Seidu A Richard, Shi Peng, Hong Qian, Jun Li, Haiya Wang

Erratum issuedAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Qing TangDepartment of Anesthesia and Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guo Xue Xiang Road, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, P. R. China.
Seidu A RichardDepartment of Biochemistry and Forensic Sciences, School of Chemical and Biochemical Sciences, C. K. Tedam University of Technology and Applied Sciences (CKT-UTAS), P. O. Box 24, Navrongo, Ghana.
Shi PengCollege of Computer Science, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guo Xue Xiang Road, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, P. R. China.
Hong QianDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guo Xue Xiang Road, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, P. R. China. wcns_2023@qq.com.
Jun LiDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Tianxing Bridge, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400047, P. R. China.
Haiya WangDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, 277 West Yanta Road, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, P.R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCoronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) is a high-risk, complex cardiac procedure that relies heavily on effective nursing collaboration to ensure surgical safety and improve patient outcomes. The advancement of machine learning (ML) and computer vision technologies, surgical video analysis has emerged as a promising tool for objective, quantitative assessment of clinical performance compared to traditional methods.

objectiveTo develop and validate an ML-based model using surgical video analysis to objectively evaluate nursing performance during CABG, identify inefficient operational patterns, and generate personalized improvement recommendations for nurses.

methodsA total of 1000 surgical video clips of CABG procedures were collected from three tertiary hospitals. Each clip was annotated by two senior cardiac nursing experts and one cardiovascular surgeon to label key nursing collaborative behaviors, including timeliness of instrument delivery, compliance with sterile procedures, and accuracy of intraoperative assistance. A Three-Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network (3D CNN) was constructed to analyze sequential nursing actions from the video clips, establishing a quantitative evaluation model for nursing operation quality. Supervised contrastive learning (SupCon) was applied to learn discriminative features between high-performance and low-performance nursing behaviors.

resultsThe annotated dataset achieved high inter-annotator agreement (Cohen’s kappa = 0.82; Krippendorff’s alpha = 0.81), indicating reliable labeling quality. Annotation batch analysis showed no significant decline in agreement over time (kappa range: 0.80–0.84), ruling out fatigue effects. The 3D CNN-based nursing performance evaluation model outperformed baseline models, achieving an accuracy of 91.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 89.8%–93.2%, verified via 1000 bootstrap iterations), precision of 90.3% (95% CI: 88.1%–92.2%), recall of 92.1% (95% CI: 90.0%–93.9%), F1-score of 91.2% (95% CI: 89.2%–92.9%), and AUC of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.93–0.97). Four inefficient operational patterns were identified via contrastive learning: delayed instrument delivery (37.2%), non-compliant sterile operations (28.5%), redundant auxiliary steps (21.3%), and inaccurate instrument handover (13.0%). Personalized recommendations based on these patterns achieved high clinical applicability (satisfaction rate 87.5% among senior cardiac nurses).

conclusionOur ML-based surgical video analysis model provides an objective, accurate, and efficient tool for nursing performance evaluation in CABG. Prospective validation linking predicted scores to clinical outcomes and external validation across diverse settings are needed before widespread clinical adoption.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceCoronary Artery BypassMachine LearningVideo RecordingConvolutional Neural NetworksHumansRetrospective Studies3D convolutional neural networkContrastive learningCoronary artery bypass graftingMachine learningNursing performance evaluationSurgical video analysis

Identifiers

PMID42032742
PMCPMC13251209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.