Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42032730›Full record

Trial reportJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2026

Effect of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for preoperative CT-guided percutaneous localization of pulmonary nodules: a randomized controlled trial.

Ying Ji, Huimin Zhang, Ruoyu Jia, Dan Cheng, Jing Hu, Xiao Zhou, Yan Shen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06441071 (Effect of Different Patient's Positions on Postoperative Analgesia of Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06441071 narecruitingnot on this map

Effect of Different Patient's Positions on Postoperative Analgesia of Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block

TypeinterventionalSponsorNanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical UniversityRan2024 to 2026Enrolled200ConditionsErector Spinae Plane BlockArmsposition
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ying Ji *Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210001, China.
Huimin Zhang *Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210001, China.
Ruoyu JiaNational Clinical Research Center, Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210002, China.
Dan ChengDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210001, China.
Jing HuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210001, China.
Xiao ZhouDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210001, China.
Yan ShenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210001, China. shenyan1113@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe increasing detection of pulmonary nodules through low-dose computed tomography screening has necessitated precise preoperative localization techniques. While local anesthesia is routinely used for CT-guided pulmonary nodule localization, it inadequately addresses deep tissue pain during pleural penetration. This study is to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) during CT-guided pulmonary nodule localization.

methodsThis single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted from June 2024 to January 2025, enrolling 82 patients undergoing preoperative CT-guided pulmonary nodule localization. Participants were randomly assigned to either control group (local anesthesia with 4 ml 1% lidocaine) or ESPB group (ultrasound-guided ESPB with 20 ml 0.375% ropivacaine plus local anesthesia). The primary outcome was numerical rating scale (NRS) score during pleural penetration. Secondary outcomes included anxiety levels, radiation exposure, procedural time, hemodynamic parameters, pneumothorax incidence, and patient satisfaction. Statistical analysis was performed using independent-sample t-test and Mann-Whitney U test.

resultsThe ESPB group demonstrated significantly lower NRS scores during pleural penetration compared to the control group (2.68 ± 1.52 vs. 5.17 ± 1.32). Patients receiving ESPB exhibited reduced preoperative anxiety (44.71 ± 3.45 vs. 50.63 ± 3.74), decreased radiation exposure (401.06 ± 266.01 vs. 875.36 ± 377.45 mGy*cm), shorter fluoroscopy time (55.10 ± 10.54 vs. 117.39 ± 20.68 s, ), and lower pneumothorax incidence (4.88% vs. 19.51%), all P < 0.05. Post-procedural comfort scores and patient satisfaction were significantly higher in the ESPB group.

conclusionsUltrasound-guided ESPB improves analgesia, reduces anxiety, radiation exposure and complications while enhancing patient satisfaction during CT-guided pulmonary nodule localization, representing a valuable adjunct for thoracic interventional procedures.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT06441071, registered May 8, 2024.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsMultiple Pulmonary NodulesNerve BlockSolitary Pulmonary NoduleTomography, X-Ray ComputedUltrasonography, InterventionalAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedParaspinal MusclesPreoperative CareProspective StudiesCT-guided localizationPainPulmonary noduleUltrasound-guided erector spinae plane block

Identifiers

PMID42032730
PMCPMC13251217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.