Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42032718›Full record

ReviewBorderline personality disorder and emotion dysregulation2026

The effectiveness of dialectical behaviour therapy training: a quantitative systematic review using Kirkpatrick's four-level model.

Melanie Harris, Carolien Lamers, Michaela Swales

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Borderline personality disorder and emotion dysregulation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Melanie HarrisNorth Wales Clinical Psychology Programme, School of Human and Behavioural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK. harris.melanie96@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-0123-7122
Carolien LamersNorth Wales Clinical Psychology Programme, School of Human and Behavioural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
Michaela SwalesNorth Wales Clinical Psychology Programme, School of Human and Behavioural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7603-1546

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective therapist training is critical to the successful implementation of Dialectical Behaviour Therapy (DBT) in routine clinical practice. Although various training approaches exist, their outcomes have not been comprehensively synthesised. This systematic review examined the effectiveness of DBT training across different delivery formats and identified key factors associated with training success. Four databases (Medline, CINAHL, PsycInfo, and PubMed) were searched for quantitative studies, and the quantitative components of mixed-methods studies, evaluating training outcomes according to Kirkpatrick’s Four-Level Model. Twenty-four studies met inclusion criteria. Six priority outcomes were assessed for certainty using the GRADE approach. Overall, DBT training was well received and associated with positive effects on therapists’ knowledge, self-efficacy, attitudes, and self-reported DBT use. More intensive training models with implementation support were linked to improved knowledge acquisition, motivation, self-reported DBT use, and, in some cases, client outcomes. The studies were highly heterogeneous in design and measures, few reported effect sizes, and most carried moderate risk of bias. As a result, the overall certainty of evidence was generally low. These findings highlight the potential effectiveness of DBT training while emphasising the need for more rigorous, standardised evaluations to strengthen the evidence base.

Indexed as

DBTDialectical behaviour therapyImplementationReviewTraining

Identifiers

PMID42032718
PMCPMC13244647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.