ReviewBorderline personality disorder and emotion dysregulation2026
The effectiveness of dialectical behaviour therapy training: a quantitative systematic review using Kirkpatrick's four-level model.
Review in Borderline personality disorder and emotion dysregulation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Effective therapist training is critical to the successful implementation of Dialectical Behaviour Therapy (DBT) in routine clinical practice. Although various training approaches exist, their outcomes have not been comprehensively synthesised. This systematic review examined the effectiveness of DBT training across different delivery formats and identified key factors associated with training success. Four databases (Medline, CINAHL, PsycInfo, and PubMed) were searched for quantitative studies, and the quantitative components of mixed-methods studies, evaluating training outcomes according to Kirkpatrick’s Four-Level Model. Twenty-four studies met inclusion criteria. Six priority outcomes were assessed for certainty using the GRADE approach. Overall, DBT training was well received and associated with positive effects on therapists’ knowledge, self-efficacy, attitudes, and self-reported DBT use. More intensive training models with implementation support were linked to improved knowledge acquisition, motivation, self-reported DBT use, and, in some cases, client outcomes. The studies were highly heterogeneous in design and measures, few reported effect sizes, and most carried moderate risk of bias. As a result, the overall certainty of evidence was generally low. These findings highlight the potential effectiveness of DBT training while emphasising the need for more rigorous, standardised evaluations to strengthen the evidence base.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.