ArticleBMC psychology2026
Measuring the psychological symptoms of pediatric palliative care patients and their caregivers: a scoping review of available instruments.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGiven the unique characteristics of patients, their diversity, and the complexity of clinical care, conditions suitable for pediatric palliative care (PPC) require a patient- and family-centered approach. In addition to assessing physical symptoms, tracking psychological symptoms during care is crucial, as they significantly affect the patient's and their family's experience and quality of life. The objective is to conduct a literature review to identify tools that measure psychological symptoms in PPC, including those for pediatric patients and their parents. This review will describe the content of these tools and present data on their validity and reliability. The ultimate aim is to develop and organize a psychological assessment framework that enables, first, a comprehensive evaluation of the psychological needs of children and parents at the time of PPC initiation, and second, ongoing monitoring throughout the entire care process.
methodsA scoping review was performed following the method of Arksey and O'Malley (2005) and reported according to the PRISMA extension for the scope revision protocol. Research has been conducted on Ebsco PsycINFO and PubMed to identify articles in English and Italian published between 2014 and 2024.
resultsThirty articles met our inclusion criteria, exploring various instruments, including patient self-report measures, parent proxy-report measures for the child, and parent self-report measures. Several studies used both child self-report and parent proxy-report versions of the same instrument.
conclusionsThis scoping review identified various tools to assess psychological aspects like anxiety, depression, stress, and quality of life in PPC patients and their parents. It also includes instruments that measure closely related constructs. This integration broadens the understanding of which dimensions and tools can be incorporated into developing a psychological assessment in PPC. However, some factors need consideration: standardising tools for clinical use, establishing and applying uniform, validated assessment methods suitable for the PPC context; choosing and tailoring tools that match the child's age and cognitive abilities; and enhancing opportunities to gather patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) from children and young people.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.