ArticleBMC nursing2026
Nurse core competency cultivation using the checklist-based Kirkpatrick model under the "cross-departmental bed-sharing" mode.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveThe concept of cross-departmental bed-sharing has been introduced to manage the sudden influx of some specialized patients, but concerns remain about whether professional care can be effectively applied. This study aims to evaluate the training effect of the Checklist-Based Kirkpatrick model program on the core competencies of nurses in the “cross-departmental bed-sharing” context.
methodsAll 76 surgical frontline nurses were included in this study, who were involved in the care of “cross-departmental bed-sharing” patients between January 2024 and June 2024. Based on their current implementation status of cross-departmental nursing, a checklist-based Kirkpatrick model core competency cultivation system was developed to support a six-month training program. The single-group pre-post study method was adopted to compare their scores of the cross-departmental theoretical test, the Competency Inventory for Registered Nurse (CIRN), and the Professional Identity Scale (PIS) before and after the training.
resultsOur checklist-based Kirkpatrick model core competency cultivation system could effectively improve the scores of cross-departmental theoretical tests (t = 24.753, P < 0.001), CIRN and its dimensions (t = 3.873 ~ 45.856, all P < 0.001), as well as PIS and its dimensions (t = 6.054 ~ 25.608, all P < 0.001). Both enter and stepwise analysis revealed that improved professional identity of nurses was positively correlated with increased scores of cross-departmental theoretical test (rpartial=0.316 and 0.340, P = 0.010 and 0.004), clinical care (rpartial=0.263 and 0.262, P = 0.034 and 0.026), teaching-coaching (rpartial=0.407 and 0.474, both P < 0.001), interpersonal relationships (rpartial=0.300 and 0.343, P = 0.015 and 0.003), and critical thinking & research aptitude (rpartial=0.433 and 0.426, both P < 0.001).
conclusionThis single-center study may offer innovative practical guidance and evaluation methods for fostering nurses’ core competencies in cross-departmental care, which holds potential value in promoting enhanced nursing quality across the hospital under the“cross-departmental bed-sharing” mode.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.