Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42032699›Full record

ArticleHarm reduction journal2026

Cannabis products and risk perceptions among people who consume and do not consume cannabis in the UK: findings from the International Cannabis Policy Study.

Elle Wadsworth, Lindsey A Hines, David Hammond, Tom P Freeman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Harm reduction journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elle WadsworthAddiction and Mental Health Group, Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK. elw200@bath.ac.uk.
Lindsey A HinesAddiction and Mental Health Group, Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.
David HammondSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada.
Tom P FreemanAddiction and Mental Health Group, Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.

Funding

CIHR PJT-153342Society for the Study of Addiction Griffith Edwards Academic FellowshipUKRI Future Leaders Fellowship MR/Y017560/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPopulation data on cannabis use-beyond prevalence and frequency of use-in the UK is lacking, yet needed to inform harm reduction messaging about cannabis. This study examined (a) recreational and medical cannabis use; (b) cannabis product use; (c) cannabis risk perceptions via three different routes of administration; (d) how product use and risk perceptions vary by reasons for use and higher risk use.

methodsData were from UK respondents of the 2023 International Cannabis Policy Study. National surveys included 3444 UK residents and 1590 people who consumed cannabis in the past year aged 16-65. Weighted logistic regression examined associations between product use, risk perceptions and reasons for use.

results50.9% of people who reported consuming cannabis reported doing so for recreational reasons only, 12.1% for medical reasons only, and 31.3% for both reasons. Dried flower was the most consumed product both in the past year (68%). Edibles (38.9%), vape oils (30.5%) and hash (27.5%) were the next commonly consumed products. People who consumed cannabis in the past year that screened positive for higher risk use were more likely to report consuming non-flower products (AOR 3.15, 95% CI 2.17, 4.58) than only dried flower. There were a higher percentage of respondents-regardless of whether they consumed cannabis or not-that reported perceiving consuming edibles daily as low or very low risk than smoking or vaping cannabis daily.

conclusionsThere is diversity in the UK cannabis market in terms of the reasons for use and the products consumed. Understanding product use beyond just 'cannabis' and risk perceptions across different routes of administration is important for informing harm reduction messaging and evaluating policies to minimise harm and maximise benefit from both recreational and medical cannabis.

Indexed as

CannabisMarijuana SmokingMarijuana UseAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHarm ReductionHumansMaleMedical MarijuanaMiddle AgedRecreational Drug UseSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomYoung AdultMedical MarijuanaCannabisDrug policyHarm reductionMethod of administrationRisk perception

Identifiers

PMID42032699
PMCPMC13262506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.