Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42032695›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2026

Completion of perioperative chemotherapy and tumor regression grade as independent predictors of one-year survival after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

Mazen Aldarwish, Jens P Hoelzen, Nader El-Sourani, Carsten Szardenings, Ahmed Abdelsamad, Dhruvajyoti Roy, Martina Holstein, Ann-Kathrin Eichelmann, Jennifer Merten, Simon Kammer and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Mazen AldarwishDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Geb. W1, Muenster, 48149, Germany. m_alda04@uni-muenster.de.
Jens P HoelzenDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Geb. W1, Muenster, 48149, Germany.
Nader El-SouraniDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Geb. W1, Muenster, 48149, Germany.
Carsten SzardeningsOtto Creutzfeldt Center for Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Muenster, Muenster, 48149, Germany.
Ahmed AbdelsamadDepartment of Surgery II, University of Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany.
Dhruvajyoti RoyDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, University Hospital of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, TX, Houston, United States.
Martina HolsteinDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Geb. W1, Muenster, 48149, Germany.
Ann-Kathrin EichelmannDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Geb. W1, Muenster, 48149, Germany.
Jennifer MertenDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Geb. W1, Muenster, 48149, Germany.
Simon KammerDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Geb. W1, Muenster, 48149, Germany.
Dmitry ShapiroDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Geb. W1, Muenster, 48149, Germany.
Wolfgang HartmannGerhard-Domagk-Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Eva WardelmannGerhard-Domagk-Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Andreas PascherDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Geb. W1, Muenster, 48149, Germany.
Mazen A JuratliDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Geb. W1, Muenster, 48149, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGastric cancer remains a major global health burden, with persistently high mortality rates despite advances in multimodal treatment. Total gastrectomy (TG) constitutes a cornerstone of curative therapy; however, the factors governing early postoperative survival remain incompletely characterized. This study aimed to identify clinical and pathological predictors of 1-year overall survival (OS) following curative-intent TG, with particular emphasis on the oncological treatment strategy and tumor regression grade (TRG).

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 145 patients who underwent TG between 2012 and 2023, excluding n = 4 adjuvant-only cases. To avoid statistical collinearity, multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was performed in two sequential steps: Model 1 assessed the treatment strategy across the overall cohort (N = 145), while Model 2 evaluated TRG exclusively within the neoadjuvant-treated subgroup (n = 85). Both models incorporated the lymph node ratio (LNR) and surgical approach, and were adjusted for resection margin status (R-status), comorbidity burden (CCI), and severe postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ III). A 60-day landmark analysis was conducted to mitigate immortal time bias.

resultsCompletion of the perioperative chemotherapy sequence was independently associated with significantly improved 1-year OS compared to neoadjuvant therapy alone (HR = 0.20; 95% CI, 0.08–0.50; p = 0.001). This survival advantage remained highly significant in the 60-day landmark analysis (p = 0.004). Notably, 55.3% of patients who initiated neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not proceed to the adjuvant phase, primarily owing to patient refusal or medical contraindications. When evaluated exclusively within the neoadjuvant-treated subgroup, a poorer TRG demonstrated a prognostic trend toward decreased survival (HR = 1.60; 95% CI, 0.98–2.59; p = 0.059). Although severe complications (CD ≥ III) occurred in 55.9% of patients, their incidence did not differ significantly across treatment groups (p = 0.894) and did not diminish the independent prognostic value of treatment completion. The surgical approach (robotic vs. open) exerted no significant effect on 1-year OS (HR = 0.88; p = 0.745).

conclusionsCompletion of the perioperative chemotherapy sequence and a favorable TRG represent two distinct and critical determinants of 1-year survival following TG for gastric cancer. While residual selection bias inherent to retrospective analyses must be acknowledged, the prognostic advantage conferred by treatment completion remains robust after adjustment for surgical morbidity, R-status, and immortal time bias. These findings underscore the prognostic importance of treatment adherence and tumor chemosensitivity, and highlight the need for individualized perioperative management strategies.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsGastrectomyNeoadjuvant TherapyPerioperative CareStomach NeoplasmsAgedChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingPostoperative ComplicationsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesGastric cancerLymph node ratioPerioperative chemotherapySurvivalTumor regression grade

Identifiers

PMID42032695
PMCPMC13109887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.