ReviewJournal of translational medicine2026
Mesenchymal stem cells for recurrent miscarriage.
Review in Journal of translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecurrent pregnancy loss (RPL), affecting 1–5% of couples, is frequently driven by immunological dysregulation, including excessive natural killer (NK) cell cytotoxicity, reduced regulatory T cell (Treg) function, Th1/Th17 dominance, and inflammatory cytokine imbalance at the maternal-fetal interface. These abnormalities disrupt immune tolerance to the semi-allogeneic fetus, leading to implantation failure or early miscarriage. Current interventions (e.g. low-dose aspirin/heparin for antiphospholipid syndrome, intravenous immunoglobulin, or corticosteroids) show variable efficacy and limitations, particularly in unexplained cases. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), with proven immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory, and tissue-repair properties, have gained regulatory approval for severe immune dysregulation conditions like steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), which shares pathophysiological parallels with immune-mediated RPL, including NK hyperactivity and deficient Treg tolerance. MAIN BODY: MSCs from sources such as bone marrow, adipose tissue, or umbilical cord exert context-dependent effects, secreting anti-inflammatory factors (e.g. IL-10, TGF-β), suppressing pro-inflammatory cytokines, inhibiting cytotoxic NK activity, and promoting Treg expansion and function to restore immune homeostasis. Preclinical studies in abortion-prone mouse models (e.g. CBA/J × DBA/2) demonstrate that MSCs reduce fetal resorption by attenuating inflammation, enhancing placental angiogenesis, and balancing decidual immune responses. Emerging human data support MSCs for uterine repair in conditions like thin endometrium or Asherman syndrome, improving endometrial thickness and pregnancy outcomes. Unlike broad immunosuppressants, MSCs offer targeted, responsive modulation with low immunogenicity, minimal tumorigenicity, and potential for autologous or allogeneic use via simple infusion routes.
conclusionMSCs represent a promising, novel therapeutic strategy for immunologically mediated RPL by addressing core immune imbalances and supporting placental/tissue health, potentially outperforming existing options in unexplained cases. Building on FDA-approved MSC therapies for analogous immune pathologies and encouraging preclinical results, clinical investigation of MSC-based interventions is warranted to establish safety, efficacy, and optimal protocols for this challenging condition. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.