Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42032690›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2026

Neural underpinnings of thematic and taxonomic processing in indirect semantic priming: evidence from the N400 and frontal negativity.

Feng Xiao, Na Xiao, Xiuling Liang, Yi Zhong, Jialin Fan, Qingfei Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Feng XiaoSchool of Psychology, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, 550025, China.
Na XiaoSchool of Psychology, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, 550025, China.
Xiuling LiangSchool of Humanities and Management, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, 523808, China.
Yi ZhongCollege of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518060, China.
Jialin FanCollege of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518060, China.
Qingfei ChenCollege of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518060, China. myth3233@126.com.

Funding

Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China, Humanities and Social Sciences Research Program 24YJC190004National Natural Science Foundation of China 31400961National Natural Science Foundation of China 32460208
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSemantic memory includes knowledge of specific categories and their diverse semantic relations, yet the neural mechanisms underlying thematic and taxonomic semantic processing remain controversial.

methodsWe explored the neural correlates of thematic and taxonomic processing via ERP in a lexical decision task. In this task, brand names served as primes, and the extension products served as targets. Five experimental conditions were compared: the core–product condition (e.g., Boeing–airliner), taxonomic condition (Boeing–helicopter), thematic condition (Boeing–suitcase), unrelated condition (Boeing–shirt), and the nonword condition (Boeing–dola) for response balance.

resultsBehavioral results showed significant priming effects (shorter RTs) for core-product, taxonomic, and thematic conditions compared to the unrelated condition. However, N400 analysis revealed that only core-product and thematic conditions showed semantic facilitation (smaller N400), while taxonomic conditions did not differ from unrelated conditions. Critically, frontal negativity (400–550 ms) was smaller for core-product and thematic conditions compared to taxonomic and unrelated conditions.

conclusionsThese findings indicate that thematic relations are more readily retrieved and contextually integrated, whereas taxonomic relations rely on feature-based categorization. The results support the dual-process model of semantic memory and are consistent with the principle of taxonomic primacy with thematic embedding, in which taxonomic structure provides the primary organizational axis while thematic relations are nested within broader contextual networks.

Indexed as

BrainEvoked PotentialsFrontal LobeMemorySemanticsAdultElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleReaction TimeYoung AdultFrontal negativityN400Taxonomic relationThematic relation

Identifiers

PMID42032690
PMCPMC13196190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.