ArticleBMC medical education2026
The influence of self-efficacy and satisfaction with e-learning on academic performance among nursing students: a multisite study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Online real-time teaching interaction and self-regulated learning ability: a cross-sectional mediation study among undergraduate nursing students.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAcademic performance and self-efficacy are closely related within educational systems. Students with higher self-efficacy across various subject areas typically exhibit higher academic achievement and students who adopt a variety of learning strategies are more likely to demonstrate high-order learning behaviors and skills. However, evidence on the relationships among e-learning satisfaction, self-efficacy, and academic performance remains inconclusive. This study was guided by Albert Bandura’s theory of self-efficacy.
aimThis study aimed to assess self-efficacy, satisfaction with e-learning, and perceived academic performance among nursing students engaged in synchronous virtual learning.
methodsThis was a multisite cross-sectional, correlational, study. The authors adhered to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist. A convenience sampling method was used to recruit the participants from different universities nationwide. Data were collected from 163 nursing students using the student outcome survey, General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE), and perceived academic performance scale. Data were analyzed using independent sample t-test, Pearson’s product moment correlation, and multiple linear regression.
resultsThe overall e-learning satisfaction was relatively low. Participants generally reported moderate to high levels of general self-efficacy. Undergraduate students had greater satisfaction with e-learning (M= 3.06, SD = .69, p<.01) and higher perceived academic performance (M= 3.46 , SD= .67, p <.05) compared to graduate students. General self-efficacy was significantly associated with satisfaction with e-learning (r = .579, p < .001) and academic performance (r = .511, p < .001). The regression analysis explained 35% of the variance and indicated that both general self-efficacy (β = 0.047, p<.001) and satisfaction with e-learning (β = .37, p <.001) were significantly associated with perceived academic performance.
conclusionsThe present results underscore the critical roles of self-efficacy and e-learning satisfaction in relation to academic performance, which is consistent with Bandura’s self-efficacy theory. These insights can inform targeted interventions to strengthen these factors, ultimately improving nursing students’ academic performance and overall e-learning satisfaction
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.