ArticleBMC medical education2026
Building qualitative research capacity in the global health workforce and developing a community of practice in parts of sub-Saharan Africa: a case study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundQualitative research offers unique insights into the lived experience of individuals with chronic conditions which can tie directly into public health priorities and identifying the need for additional support. More participatory approaches and qualitative data surrounding chronic diseases are needed in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Valuable “insider” insights are often missing as the conceptualisation of research often overlooks the value of such interactions. For successful and meaningful global health research, it is imperative to involve in-country experts and strengthen the capacity of research teams with qualitative skills.
methodsTo address this, two hybrid qualitative research skills workshops were conducted in West Africa (Ghana; with virtual attendees from Nigeria) and East Africa (Kenya; with virtual attendees from Tanzania and Ethiopia) to deliver training and develop support networks as part of the ‘Transforming Parkinson’s Care in Africa’ research project. Both workshops were conducted over two days and involved presentations, discussions, and activities to ensure attendee interaction, while providing a comprehensive overview of qualitative research.
resultsMaterials were developed by facilitators, drawing on an experience of teaching qualitative methods and supporting research development in the UK, and doing qualitative research in SSA. Fifty-eight healthcare professionals and researchers attended the training. Following the training, short-term improvement was noted in self-rated knowledge and skills, with positive qualitative feedback from attendees. To ensure a lasting impact of the training, a community of practice has been established to provide continual support and mentorship to attendees. Five perpetual qualitative software licenses were also purchased for use by attendees and their teams to facilitate collaborative analysis of TraPCAf data and allow access beyond the duration of the project.
conclusionsThere is a desire to develop qualitative research skills among researchers and healthcare professionals in SSA. This case study offers an example of how such training can be developed and delivered. To continue these learnings forward, a community of practice has been formed to ensure longer-term impact, with the ultimate goal of enhancing the qualitative research capacity of the public health workforce across SSA. This is enacted through continual engagement and mentorship of workshop attendees and addressing financial barriers to success by funding software access for individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.