ArticleBMC urology2026
Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography as an adjunct to angiography for renal arterial bleeding: a four-case series.
Article in BMC urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRenal artery bleeding is an uncommon but clinically important complication of surgery, percutaneous procedures, and trauma. Computed tomography (CT) is commonly used; however, indeterminate findings or concerns regarding iodinated contrast can delay hemostasis in some cases. Bedside contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) may provide real-time information to support triage to angiography and embolization. CASE PRESENTATION: We describe four hemodynamically stable patients: post-nephrectomy, post-percutaneous nephrolithotomy, post-biopsy, and blunt trauma. CT was indeterminate in two cases and deliberately omitted in two cases to avoid delay or contrast exposure. CEUS demonstrated focal contrast pooling, pooling with associated leakage, or jet-like extravasation, helping to localize the suspected culprit branch and supporting subsequent digital subtraction angiography. Superselective coil embolization achieved angiographic stasis in all patients, with no rebleeding during the index admission. Follow-up CEUS at 48 h demonstrated findings consistent with hemostasis, and interval CT showed expected hematoma evolution without residual pseudoaneurysm.
conclusionCEUS served as a bedside adjunct decision-support tool across diverse etiologies when CT results were equivocal or deferred, facilitating angiography referral and potentially contributing to timely hemostasis while preserving uninvolved renal parenchyma. This case series demonstrates concordant findings between CEUS and angiography and supports the potential role of CEUS-guided triage for acute renal arterial bleeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.