ArticleBMC public health2026
Disability and sexual harassment and coercion in higher education in Ghana: the moderating role of financial support.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionHigher education students with disabilities are susceptible to all forms of violence and have an increased risk of sexual harassment and coercion (SHC). SHC victims face a range of structural and social marginalizations, including physical accessibility challenges, communication barriers, and social isolation, which truncate their ability to seek help or assert boundaries. In Ghana, where about 8% (2,098,138) of the population live with disabilities, SHC and how it varies across disability types and differential socioeconomic backgrounds have received limited scholarly attention. The present study, therefore, examines how socioeconomic background shapes the relationship between disability type and experience of SHC.
methodsWe used a cross-sectional study design. A census approach was used to include all students with disabilities across four public universities in Ghana, who were available to participate (n = 438). Experience of SHC was measured using the Sexual Harassment and Coercion Experience (SHCE) scale. The moderator variable was the source of financial support. Multiple linear regression was used to estimate the effects of independent variables on the dependent variables.
resultsParticipants reported various disabilities, including visual impairment (52.97%), physical disability (27.17%), hearing impairment (16.67%), and other disabilities (3.20%). Majority of participants relied on parents and relatives for financial support (62.33%), followed by scholarships (24.43%) and self-financing (13.24%). Compared to participants living with physical disability, visually impaired students experienced significantly higher SHCE overall (B = 0.241, p < 0.01), verbal sexual abuse (B = 0.373, p < 0.001), and sexual coercion (B = 0.249, p < 0.01). Students with hearing impairments who receive financial support from parents and relatives reported significantly lower SHCE compared to those who fund themselves.
conclusionExperience of sexual harassment and coercion differs across disability types among university students. Considering the critical role of the source of financial support in SHCE, it is imperative that students with disabilities are provided a sustainable source of funding along with protective interventions tailored to diverse disability conditions. More importantly, universities ought to prioritise a multi-level and inclusive approach to achieve equitable educational experiences for all learners.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.