Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42032541›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2026

Exercise during chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy and treatment delivery and tumor response outcomes: a scoping review.

Takuya Fukushima, Jiro Nakano, Katsuyoshi Suzuki, Keiichi Osaki, Takashi Tanaka, Taro Okayama, Junichiro Inoue, Jack B Fu, Shinichiro Morishita

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Takuya FukushimaFaculty of Rehabilitation, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan.
Jiro NakanoFaculty of Rehabilitation, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan.
Katsuyoshi SuzukiDivision of Rehabilitation Medicine, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Keiichi OsakiDepartment of Rehabilitation, Panasonic Health Insurance Organization, Matsushita Memorial Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Takashi TanakaDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medical Care and Nursing, Osaka University of Medical Sciences, Osaka, Japan.
Taro OkayamaDivision of Rehabilitation Medicine, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Junichiro InoueDivision of Rehabilitation Medicine, Kobe University Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Jack B FuUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Shinichiro MorishitaDepartment of Physical Therapy, School of Health Science, Fukushima Medical University, 10-6, Sakaemachi, Fukushima, Fukushima, 960-8516, Japan. morishit@fmu.ac.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExercise during cancer treatment has been proposed not only as supportive care but also as a biologically active intervention with potential systemic effects. Mechanistic studies suggest that exercise modulates immune function and induces systemic signaling through exerkines, which may influence responsiveness to cancer therapies. However, evidence regarding exercise effects on treatment delivery, such as relative dose intensity, treatment completion, and tumor response, remains limited and heterogeneous. This scoping review aimed to map and summarize existing literature on associations between exercise, treatment delivery, and tumor response outcomes, highlighting patterns and gaps that inform future research.

methodsWe searched the PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature Complete databases from inception to November 6, 2025. Studies examining the association between exercise interventions and treatment-related outcomes in patients with cancer were included.

resultsFollowing eligibility assessment, 23 studies comprising 31 exercise interventions were included. Most studies have focused on breast and colorectal cancers and spanned various treatment phases, ranging from neoadjuvant to adjuvant settings. Treatment-related outcomes most commonly reflected treatment delivery and tolerance (e.g., relative dose intensity, dose delay or reduction, and treatment completion). Moreover, tumor response outcomes were reported, including pathological complete response, tumor size, response according to RECIST, and downstaging. Exercise interventions commonly consisted of aerobic exercise alone or in combination with resistance training, were predominantly supervised, and were often prescribed at moderate-to-high intensities, with a frequency of three to four sessions per week. Associations with favorable treatment-related outcomes were more frequently reported for supervised, moderate-to-high intensity exercise; however, null findings were common across all outcomes and cancer types.

conclusionsCurrent evidence indicates an inconsistent association between exercise and selected treatment delivery and tumor response outcomes in patients with cancer, suggesting a potential, context-dependent role of exercise under specific conditions. Future studies should clearly differentiate among treatment tolerance, delivery, and tumor response outcomes and investigate whether—and how—exercise influences these outcomes across various cancer types and treatment phases.

Indexed as

ChemoradiotherapyExerciseExercise TherapyNeoplasmsHumansTreatment OutcomeCancerExercise oncologyRelative dose intensityTreatment completionTumor response

Identifiers

PMID42032541
PMCPMC13244998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.