Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42032538›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026

Temporal trends in estimated fetal weight accuracy following national guideline implementation: a six-year cohort study at a tertiary center in Southern China (2014-2019).

Yuji Wang, Jianxin Zhao, Jing Tao, Chunyi Chen, Ke Wang, Yao Tang, Yimei Liao, Cheng Huang, Qin Zeng, Jiayuan Zhou and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Yuji Wang *National Office for Maternal and Child Health Surveillance of China, National Center for Birth Defect Surveillance of China, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Sec.3 No.17 South RenMin Road, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China.
Jianxin Zhao *National Office for Maternal and Child Health Surveillance of China, National Center for Birth Defect Surveillance of China, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Sec.3 No.17 South RenMin Road, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China.
Jing TaoNational Office for Maternal and Child Health Surveillance of China, National Center for Birth Defect Surveillance of China, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Sec.3 No.17 South RenMin Road, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China.
Chunyi ChenNational Office for Maternal and Child Health Surveillance of China, National Center for Birth Defect Surveillance of China, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Sec.3 No.17 South RenMin Road, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China.
Ke WangNational Office for Maternal and Child Health Surveillance of China, National Center for Birth Defect Surveillance of China, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Sec.3 No.17 South RenMin Road, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China.
Yao TangPrenatal Diagnosis Center in Guizhou Province, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China.
Yimei LiaoDepartment of Ultrasound, Shenzhen Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital, Southern Medical University, No.2004 Hongli Road, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518028, China.
Cheng HuangNational Office for Maternal and Child Health Surveillance of China, National Center for Birth Defect Surveillance of China, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Sec.3 No.17 South RenMin Road, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China.
Qin ZengNational Office for Maternal and Child Health Surveillance of China, National Center for Birth Defect Surveillance of China, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Sec.3 No.17 South RenMin Road, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China.
Jiayuan ZhouNational Office for Maternal and Child Health Surveillance of China, National Center for Birth Defect Surveillance of China, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Sec.3 No.17 South RenMin Road, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China.
Zheng LiuNational Office for Maternal and Child Health Surveillance of China, National Center for Birth Defect Surveillance of China, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Sec.3 No.17 South RenMin Road, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China.
Hong KangNational Office for Maternal and Child Health Surveillance of China, National Center for Birth Defect Surveillance of China, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Sec.3 No.17 South RenMin Road, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China.
Lang CuiNational Office for Maternal and Child Health Surveillance of China, National Center for Birth Defect Surveillance of China, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Sec.3 No.17 South RenMin Road, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China.
Shengli LiDepartment of Ultrasound, Shenzhen Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital, Southern Medical University, No.2004 Hongli Road, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518028, China. lsl13530386700@126.com.
Jun ZhuNational Office for Maternal and Child Health Surveillance of China, National Center for Birth Defect Surveillance of China, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Sec.3 No.17 South RenMin Road, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China. zhujun028@163.com.

Funding

the National Key Research and Development Program of China 2024YFC2707000, 2024YFC2707003 and 2022YFC2704701)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn 2012, China released its first national guidelines for prenatal ultrasound screening, marking a major step toward standardized and assessable prenatal ultrasound practice nationwide. However, real-world evidence on the effectiveness of these guidelines in clinical practice remains limited, particularly from large-scale, long-term datasets. To address this gap, we aimed to examine temporal trends in the accuracy of ultrasound-based estimated fetal weight (EFW) following the guidelines’ implementation in China. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis retrospective cohort study analyzed real-world data from 31,681 singleton pregnancies between 2014 and 2019, drawn from the integrated ultrasound and perinatal databases at a tertiary maternity hospital in southern China. Temporal trends in EFW accuracy, fetal biometric parameters (biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference, femur length), and diagnostic performance for fetal growth abnormalities were analysed by calendar quarter from January 2014 to December 2019.

resultEFW accuracy improved progressively over time, with the mean percentage error nearing zero and the proportion of estimates within 10% and 15% of birthweight rising from 78.0% to 93.2% in 2014 to 86.2% and 97.3% in 2019 (OR = 1.032 and 1.045; P < 0.001). Accuracy of all biometric parameters increased, particularly for femur length (β = 0.002). Detection of extreme fetal growth abnormalities based on EFW became more consistent, with detection rates and false-positive rates (FPRs) for severe large-for-gestational-age (EFW > 97th percentile) decreasing from 2.06% to 0.67% (FPRs 1.59% to 0.22%), while fetal growth restriction (EFW <3rd percentile) detection slightly increased from 0.37% to 0.50% (FPRs 0.19% to 0.28%), and false-negative rates remained stable. Similar improvements were observed using absolute birthweight thresholds, with reduced overestimation of macrosomia and enhanced detection of low birthweight, indicating a better balance in EFW’s diagnostic performance across the fetal growth spectrum.

conclusionThis large-scale longitudinal study revealed sustained improvements in EFW accuracy, biometric measurement consistency, and fetal growth abnormality detection following China’s 2012 national guidelines. These advances likely reflect standardized protocols, training, quality assurance, and accumulating operator experience. Future multicenter studies are needed to assess their broader clinical impact.

Indexed as

Fetal WeightUltrasonography, PrenatalAdultBirth WeightChinaFemaleFetal Growth RetardationHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicPregnancyRetrospective StudiesTertiary Care CentersEstimated fetal weightFetal growth restrictionGuidelineLarge for gestational agePrenatal ultrasoundUltrasound measurement accuracy

Identifiers

PMID42032538
PMCPMC13248266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.