ArticleBMC pediatrics2026
Early surgical intervention for orbital complications of pediatric acute rhinosinusitis: outcomes and algorithmic approach.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOrbital complications of acute rhinosinusitis (ARS) in children require prompt intervention, but consensus on optimal surgical timing and approach remains limited. This study defines evidence-based indications and evaluates outcomes of surgical management while proposing a severity-stratified algorithm to guide intervention.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of 48 patients aged <15 years who underwent surgery for ARS-related orbital complications (47 subperiosteal abscesses [SPA], 1 orbital abscess) at a tertiary center. Surgical criteria included SPA >4 mm, visual impairment, or intravenous antibiotic failure. Approaches compared were purely endonasal (16.7%) versus combined endonasal/external drainage (83.3%). Outcomes included resolution rates and reoperations. Limitations included retrospective design and variability in preoperative antibiotic regimens.
resultsThe combined approach group had a 95.8% success rate (46/48 patients), with 2 cases requiring reoperation (4.2%). Exclusive endonasal drainage was successful in all 8 cases where applied. No permanent visual deficits or major complications occurred. Surgical outcomes were independent of preoperative antibiotic heterogeneity, though this variability precluded direct medical-surgical comparisons.
conclusionsSurgery for pediatric ARS-related orbital complications achieves excellent outcomes when guided by radiographic and clinical criteria. Combined drainage is reserved for extensive abscesses, while endonasal alone suffices for localized cases. These findings support a standardized algorithm (Figure 3) integrating abscess location, volume, and clinical progression to optimize care. Future prospective studies should address antibiotic protocol standardization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.