ArticleBMC pediatrics2026
Optimized fetal head circumference estimation in 2D ultrasound using EfficientNet-B7 and Adam optimizer.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate measurement of fetal head circumference (HC) is critical for monitoring fetal growth and the diagnosis of microcephaly and macrocephaly. However, conventional manual 2D ultrasound measurements tend to vary because of factors such as the presence of amniotic fluid, acoustic shadowing, occlusions, and variations in fetal position. To address these problems, this study proposes a regression-based deep learning model using EfficientNet-B7 and the Adam optimizer to enhance the accuracy and robustness of HC measurement. The proposed model utilizes EfficientNet’s powerful feature extraction capabilities and compound scaling, along with Mean Squared Error loss to minimize prediction errors. The model was trained on the HC-18 training set and evaluated on a test set consisting of 335 images, the proposed approach yielded a normalized MAE of 0.028 and an HC-specific MAE of 1.978 mm. Although this error rate is higher than that of segmentation-based approaches on the entire HC-18 dataset (usually 1–2 mm), the regression model shows the feasibility of fast, fully automatic HC measurement with comparatively low model complexity and an inference time of approximately 0.03 s. These results demonstrate the trade-off between geometric modeling accuracy and computational efficiency. Future work will focus on training the model on larger and more diverse datasets, accelerating processing, and investigating alternative training methods to better address the challenges of ultrasound imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.