ArticleBMC bioinformatics2026
FiloAnalyzer: a deep learning approach for cell filopodia segmentation.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeFilopodia are thin, finger-like extensions that project from the surface of cells. Present in various cell types, analyzing these structures can yield significant insights into cellular behavior and function. However, a manual analysis is impractical, resulting in a bottleneck in processing large-scale datasets.
methodsThis paper introduces FiloAnalyzer, an open-source toolbox for automatically analyzing cell filopodia. The toolbox is powered with a user-friendly GUI, allowing the segmentation of batches of microscopy images and extracting a set of quantitative parameters, incorporating both a deep learning-based and an image-processing method. As data and annotation scarcity are typical of this domain, we compare popular ImageNet supervised to self-supervised pre-training, adopting state-of-the-art contrastive, self-distillation, and generative approaches based on diffusion models in an attempt to maximize segmentation performance in a low-data regime.
resultsWe validate our toolbox on a dataset of annotated fluorescent images of neural crest cells, benchmarking our results with three popular filopodia segmentation toolboxes. Furthermore, we show how self-supervision can be a promising tool to deal with the limited availability of annotated data in this domain, obtaining a significant improvement over ImageNet supervised pre-training, with as few as ten annotated images.
conclusionOur experiments show that the deep learning pipeline outperforms image processing-based available alternatives. We release both an annotated dataset and the toolbox as open-source to foster further research on this topic. The toolbox code and dataset are available at https://github.com/Malga-Vision/FiloAnalyzerToolbox.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.