ReviewInsights into imaging2026
Swedish national recommendations for MR safety 2026.
Review in Insights into imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Editorial for "Concordance Between MR Safety Guidance Documents on Conditions for a Safe MR Environment".Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Article
- An exploratory multimodal imaging and clinicopathological strategy for suspected Kümmell's disease in the absence of MRI.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This document outlines the Swedish national recommendations for MR safety, developed by the Swedish Alliance for MR Safety (SAMS). Grounded in international guidelines, Swedish legislation, and scientific evidence, these recommendations have been tailored to the Swedish healthcare context while remaining broadly applicable across European systems. The guidelines emphasize universal safety principles in MR practice, including risk prevention, equipment safety, and organizational integration. SAMS adopts a comprehensive, life-cycle approach to MR safety-from planning to decommissioning-addressing clinical, research, and veterinary use. By sharing this English translation, SAMS aims to support international collaboration and provide a foundational model for countries developing or updating their MR safety frameworks, promoting harmonization and improved safety standards across Europe. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This article presents and critically explores key MR safety issues through Sweden's national MR safety recommendations, illustrating how their evidence-based, life-cycle approach can guide harmonized and high-standard MR safety practices across healthcare systems in Europe. KEY POINTS: The document presents national MR safety guidelines, based on international standards, Swedish law, and scientific evidence. The guidelines cover all stages of MR use, with a focus on risk prevention, equipment safety, and organizational integration. Swedish Alliance for MR Safety (SAMS) supports international cooperation and offers a model for enhancing safety standards across Europe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.